
  
  Lodge Renewal - Part One
  
  by Wor. Brother Frederic L. 
  Milliken
  The peak of 
  20th 
  Century Mainstream Freemasonry membership is generally conceded by Masonic 
  scholars to be 1946-1960. After that things went steadily downhill and we are 
  not just talking about membership.
  It has been a 
  long time hypothesis of mine that the Vietnam War was the principle culprit of 
  the 60s and 70s decline of Freemasonry. The feel good, drop out culture had a 
  lot to do with dissuading anybody from joining anything. Freemasonry wasn’t 
  the only one to suffer. Other Fraternal Societies, churches, ethnic clubs, 
  sewing circles, literary guilds, agricultural Societies – you name it, they 
  all withered and dried up. Some went belly up and others just struggled along 
  at half speed.
  If the 
  hypothesis holds true then FREEMASONRY SKIPPED A WHOLE GENERATION. The history 
  of Freemasonry shows that about every 20 years or so the Old Guard would be 
  replaced by the New Guard. You could in that time period see a total 
  transformation of leadership with the corresponding vitality that youth 
  brings.
  But when the 
  Masonic leaders of 1940-1960 were not replaced because membership lagged 
  significantly, what happened is that the Forties to Sixties leaders did double 
  duty; they stayed on for another tour through the Sixties and Seventies. Thus 
  Mainstream Freemasonry had the same leadership from 1940-1980 (of course there 
  was a trickle of new blood replacements).
  This had some 
  really bad effects on Freemasonry. The older leadership was less ambitious. 
  Craft Lodge members withdrew into a comfort zone of inactivity. They became 
  Isolationist Freemasons. Degrees were seldom performed. Masonic education was 
  something that was felt to be unneeded. If you were 80 years old and you 
  didn’t know it now, then you never would.
  Just like my 
  Grandfather who perpetually failed to understand why things cost so much more 
  when he was 80 then when he was 20, Craft Lodges couldn’t understand the need 
  for raising dues, so they froze them. For many years, retired seniors living 
  on fixed incomes and who were a Lodge’s voting majority artificially held down 
  the cost of maintaining Masonic membership. In the process they strangled the 
  finances of a Lodge. Masonic programs, lavish social events and well attended 
  ceremonies had to be cut or eliminated. Masonic buildings suffered in decay as 
  funds to repair and maintain them were lacking.
  Most of the 
  officer’s chairs were occupied by Past Masters. Masonic Communications most 
  often consisted of a business meeting followed by a collation of baloney 
  sandwiches and coffee with the consistency of molasses. The sad part to all 
  this is that Lodges met without practicing Freemasonry.
  Such a 
  picture is a bit of an exaggeration. There were many fine Lodges that did 
  great work, just not enough of them. The inability to provide a great Masonic 
  experience made it difficult to attract new members.
  Somewhere 
  along the line Grand Lodges woke up and realized that something had to be 
  done. Unfortunately sometimes the cure can be worse than the disease. Grand 
  Lodge responses of jurisdictional mandates, relaxed standards, 
  Institutionalized charity and One Day Classes brought in some quantity without 
  the quality. Now we had a flock of Masons in name only – MINOs. And some MINOs 
  assumed positions of Masonic leadership.
  When the 
  Information Age hit and every household started to get a PC, the Masonic 
  response was archaic and self-defeating. Instead of embracing the new 
  technology they dismissed it or banned it. When they finally admitted that 
  they were wrong, instead of employing outside professionals it became in house 
  amateur time.
  Some in the 
  Craft were muttering enough is enough. Along came an Australian Mason in named
  
  Kent Henderson and the Masonic reform movement was born in 1992. 
  
  Oh, I’m sure 
  there were some noteworthy earlier contributors but Henderson wasn’t just a 
  talker he was a doer. In 1993 he, with 34 others, formed Lodge Epicurean based 
  on the European Concept. When Henderson wrote his paper explaining the 
  European Concept – 
  BACK TO THE FUTURE: A prescription For Masonic Renewal - he spread the 
  word to the United States and beyond.
  
    
    The Creation of Lodge Epicurean
    In early 
    1992, a group of mostly young (but Masonically experienced) freemasons 
    living in Victorian provincial city of Geelong, lamenting the state of the 
    Craft, decided to do something about it in a practical way. They determined 
    to form a new lodge which would be quite different in a great many ways to 
    others working under the Victorian Constitution. Lodge Epicurean, as they 
    named it, would be a top quality lodge, with the highest standards. Anything 
    not consistent with such high standards would be discarded.
    
      
      
    
    It was decided to form the lodge on Two Great Pillars, which are as 
    follows:
    
      - A high 
      quality lodge must be paid for — therefore dues need to commensurate with 
      this. Based on the successful European formula, it was decided on dues at 
      about the average weekly wage.
 
      - A lodge 
      has two main challenges: getting members, and keeping them.
 
    
    
    (a) GETTING MEMBERS. Only 
    an existing member can propose a candidate. We suspected that the reason why 
    members did not repeatedly propose candidates, if ever, was because they 
    either consciously or sub-consciously did not think their friends would be 
    interested. There are probably a variety of reasons for this, but one is 
    probably fear that in the event that their friends do not like the lodge, 
    their friendship might be affected. Members these days are rarely proud of 
    the standards of their lodges. However, if a lodge has very high standards, 
    members do not hesitate to ask their friends to join. This is the secret of 
    gaining new members, and lots of them.
    (b) 
    KEEPING THEM. A high quality lodge will greatly assist in holding 
    new members in the longer term, but this is still not enough. There are 
    other social organizations that offer quality. Freemasonry has one great 
    thing more to offer, available nowhere else — freemasonry! But what is it? 
    It is not a charitable organization like Rotary or Lions (though some would 
    make it out to be), although charity is an important part of its teachings. 
    Masonry is first and foremost an education society, one which TEACHES moral 
    and ethics – a way of life. Secondly, Masonry is a universal brotherhood, 
    with all that implies. Thus, what a lodge must do is teach. Exposure to the 
    three degrees is but the beginning. What a lodge must understand is the 
    overriding reason why a brother will sit in a Masonic lodge in the medium to 
    long term is because he knows exactly why he is sitting there. The answer to 
    keeping them, therefore, is to give them quality, and to concurrently 
    educate them in Masonry.
  
  The word was 
  picked up in Texas where a European Concept Lodge was formed in College 
  Station,  St. Albans Lodge No. 1455, founded in 1992 by Pete Normand and 
  elsewhere about the U.S the most notable being in Indiana. In a popular 
  Internet Indiana Masonic Forum much discussion led Jeff Naylor, Chris Hodapp 
  and Nathan Brindle, among others, to form the Traditional Observance (TO) 
  Lodge,
  
  Lodge Vitruvian and to publish the American version of BACK TO THE FUTURE,
  
  LAUDABLE PURSUIT with due homage to Past Grand Master Dwight Smith.
  
    Lodge 
    Vitruvian operates under what has come to be known as “The European Concept” 
    as popularized by Lodge Epicurean, among others, in Australia.
    The 
    European Concept is known for its dedication to a number of primary tenets:
    
      - Dignity 
      and high standards are to be maintained by the Lodge in all its 
      undertakings.
 
      - Nothing 
      short of excellence in ritualistic work is acceptable.
 
      - 
      Candidates shall be advanced only after having undertaken an intensive 
      program of Masonic education and proving themselves proficient in open 
      Lodge.
 
      - The 
      Lodge enjoys the fellowship of the Festive Board at a local restaurant 
      following all Regular and Emergent Meetings of the Lodge.
 
      - Members 
      are expected to dress properly to attend to the duties of the Lodge.
 
      - A Lodge 
      of this caliber must be paid for.
 
    
  
  Fast forward 
  a short time to the founding of the 
  Masonic Restoration Foundation where TO Lodges nationwide were encouraged, 
  aided and networked. President Dennis Chornenky in his paper
  
  THE TRADITIONAL OBSERVANCE LODGE, once again makes clear what is being 
  promoted.
  
    While many 
    Masons may have heard about European Concept lodges, which are themselves a 
    relatively new concept in American Freemasonry, few have heard of the 
    Traditional Observance lodge. Traditional Observance lodge s are similar to 
    European Concept lodges in that they also incorporate higher dues, festive 
    boards, a strict dress code and higher standards of ritual, but differ in 
    that they choose to follow a close observance of the traditional initiatic 
    elements of Continental European and South American Freemasonry.
    This 
    observance is characterized by a solemn approach to holding stated 
    communications and conferring degrees, the use of the Chamber of Reflection 
    as part of the initiation ceremony, forming the Chain of Union after the 
    meetings, longer time between degrees and the requirement for candidates to 
    present a paper before the lodge on the lessons of each degree prior to 
    advancement. Traditional Observance lodges are also more likely to use the 
    term Agape rather than Festive Board to describe the meal which follows the 
    meetings. Agape is the ancient Greek word for “love,” and in Freemasonry the 
    term signifies a meal eaten in common by a congregation of Masons in token 
    of Brotherly Love.
  
  TO Lodges, 
  while they continue to grow, have never really caught on to the point that 
  they can be found neither in every state nor in abundance anywhere. 
  
  
    
    
  
  All this serves as background information for what follows. In Part 2 to 
  this article we will explore alternatives to the TO concept that can be 
  adapted to existing Lodges.
  
   
  