
  
   
  
  The Builder Magazine
  
  
  October 1916 - Volume II - Number 
  10
  
   
  MEMORIAL 
  TO LAFAYETTE
  BY BRO. GEO. W. BAIRD, P.G.M., 
  DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
  THE most beautiful group of 
  bronze statuary in Washington is that of La Fayette. It shows a greater number 
  of figures than any other group in the city, and is highly artistic in every 
  way. It is situated in La Fayette Square, very properly, but unfortunately, 
  there are other statues in that square. It deserved a separate site.
   
  The group contains the 
  figures of the French leaders who were prominent as our allies in the War of 
  the Revolution, namely, La Fayette, Rochambeau, D'Estaing, Duportail and De 
  Grasse.
   
  The figures of these officers 
  are all of life size. La Fayette surmounts the pedestal, while the others are 
  at the base; La Fayette appearing in our continental uniform. The figure of 
  America is at the base, offering her sword to La Fayette.
   
  This magnificent group was 
  modeled and cast in France, for which Congress made an appropriation of 
  $50,000 in 1885. It was completed and turned over to the government in 1891, 
  but there was no ceremony or demonstration whatever when it was unveiled.
   
  During the time this group 
  was being sculptured in France, our Ambassador at Paris, Gen. Horace Porter, 
  was making his search for the body of Brother John Paul Jones, which search 
  continued for a period of six years before his efforts were crowned with 
  success.
   
  Mr. Henry Watterson, who was 
  present when Jones' coffin was opened, told the writer that its resemblance to 
  Brother Houdon's bust of Jones was so close that the entire party 
  involuntarily raised their hats.
   
  The critical comparison of 
  measurements of the head, with the sculptured bust of Houdon, the measurements 
  of the body, the searching examination of the lungs, heart and kidneys, etc., 
  by the savants of the French Academy, under the direct guidance of such 
  eminent men as Dr. Capitan and Dr. Papillaut, left no question of identity 
  unanswered.
   
  La Fayette was made a Mason 
  in an Army Lodge at Valley Forge, the degree being conferred by Washington 
  himself. We find several records of his having visited lodges; for example, 
  Lodge No. 9, Williamsburg, Va., just after the surrender of Lord Cornwallis, 
  and in company with Thomas Nelson, John Marshall, and George Washington.
   
  D'Estaing's name is found in 
  the list of members of that famous lodge Neuf Soeurs in Paris. Rochambeau's 
  Masonic record is lost, but (Monsieur Vadecard says) Madame Rochambeau was a 
  member of the Ladies Masonic Auxiliary in Paris, membership in which was 
  dependent on her husband's Masonic identity.
   
  La Fayette served in the 
  battles of Brandywine, Monmouth, and Yorktown. He offered his services to the 
  Colonies in 1777, and being accepted, came at once to America.
   
  The magnificent appearance of 
  the La Fayette statue, though overlooked in its inauguration, attracted 
  unusual attention. It is by far the most beautiful and most artistic of any of 
  its kind in the city, and is the first memorial of the Revolutionary services 
  to any foreigner.
   
  Archbishop Ireland, an Irish 
  enthusiast, in passing was struck not only by the singular beauty of the 
  morial, but evidently felt a twinge of jealousy, for at the meeting of the 
  Friendly Sons of St. Patrick, in York, shortly after, he was the principal 
  speaker and said:
   
  "I charge you, Sons of St. 
  Patrick, to see to it that in Washington City, near the monument of La Fayette 
  and Rochambeau there be erected a monument to some Irish Soldier to 
  commemorate the part Ireland took in the Revolutionary War."  At the "meet" of 
  the Ancient Order of Hibernians at Denver in 1902, Mr. Dunleary, in his speech 
  of welcome, said "the roll of honor in the war of the Revolution shows such 
  names as General Moylan, General Sullivan, who led the retreat successfully 
  across Long Island and in whose honor the National Congress is contemplating a 
  memorial in New Hampshire."
   
  At Denver the speech of 
  Archbishop Ireland was repeated (or quoted) by one of the speakers. They 
  probably discovered that General Sullivan (Grand Master of Masons in N. H.) 
  was not the kind of an Irish soldier the Bishop would endorse, and they 
  shifted to John Barry, a captain in the Navy (not a soldier) during the 
  Revolutionary War, whose record was fine.
   
  A Bill paraphrasing Senator 
  Lodge's Bill for the John Paul Jones Memorial, substituting the name of Barry 
  for that of Jones, was introduced in Congress. The Barry Bill was lobbied by 
  its adherents; the Jones Bill was neglected. But the Committee evidently 
  thought it would not do to appropriate for the hitherto obsure Barry and 
  neglect the historic Jones, so the two Bills were reported the same day, and 
  were passed the same day.
   
  At the obsequies of John Paul 
  Jones at Annapolis, April 24th, 1906, when the President, Secretary of the 
  Navy, Governor of Maryland, General Horace Porter, the French Ambassador and 
  others spoke, it was decided to place the body of John Paul Jones in the crypt 
  of the chapel (which was being built) in imitation of the tomb of Napoleon at 
  Paris, and the President also determined to ask Congress to reimburse General 
  Porter for the $35,000 he had spent in the recovery and identification of the 
  body. General Porter, however, asked that the $35,000 be added to the 
  architect's estimate for the changes in the crypt, to make it more beautiful, 
  which was agreed to.
   
  So the memorial of the great 
  La Fayette and that of John Paul Jones, both Freemasons, are linked by a 
  modern tie.
   
  The ubiquitous Hoosier, who 
  is more practical than aesthetic, gazed intently at the La Fayette statue, 
  evolving an interpretation. Finally he said: "The girl at the base is saying 
  'Here, Mr. Soldier, I'll swap this sword for some of the clothes on your arm. 
  I need the clothes and you may need the sword.' " 
   
  FREEMASON'S MARCH
   
  The words of this song were 
  first printed in Watt's "Musical
  Miscellany, (V. III), 1730, 
  under the title "The Freemason's
  Health." It appears to many 
  eighteenth century song collections,
  the tune most commonly used 
  appearing for the first time in "Pills
  to Purge Melancholy," (Vol. 
  2), 1719. It was popular well into the
  nineteenth century.
   
  Come, let us prepare, 
  
  We brothers that are
  Met together on merry 
  Occasion; 
  Let us drink, laugh and sing,
  
  Our Wine has a Spring,
  'Tis a Health to an Accepted 
  Mason. 
  The World is in Pain 
  
  Our Secret to gain,
  But still let them wonder and 
  gaze on;
  Till they're shewn the Light
  They'll ne'er know the right
  Word or Sign of an Accepted 
  Mason. 
  'Tis This and 'tis That,
  
  They cannot tell what,
  Why so many great Men in the 
  Nation 
  Should Aprons put on, 
  
  To make themselves one
  With a Free or an Accepted 
  Mason. 
  Great Kings, Dukes, and 
  Lords, 
  Have laid by their Swordes,
  This our Myst'ry to put a 
  good Grace on, 
  And ne'er been asham'd 
  
  To hear themselves nam'd
  With a Free or an Accepted 
  Mason.
  Antiquity's Pride 
  We have on our Side,
  It makes a Man Just in his 
  Station; 
  There's nought but what's 
  Good 
  To be understood
  By a Free or an Accepted 
  Mason.
  Then Joyn Hand in Hand,
  T'each other firm stand,
  Let's be merry, and put a 
  bright Face on; 
  What Mortal can boast 
  
  So noble a Toast,
  As a Free or an Accepted 
  Mason ?
   
  ----o----
   
  THE STORY OF "OLD GLORY"--THE 
  OLDEST FLAG BY BRO. JNO. W. BARRY, IOWA
   
  THE ONLY FLAG OF THE 
  REVOLUTION KNOWN TO EXIST
   
  PART IV
   
  In Fig. 32 (Color Plate) is a 
  photograph of the only flag now in existence known to have been carried as a 
  regimental flag during the Revolution. If you should enter the flag room of 
  the State House at Annapolis, Maryland, you would see there this most 
  treasured flag labeled as follows:--
   
  "NO. 1--OLD GLORY" (56)
   
  This flag is cherished as THE 
  flag of the Revolution. It is the flag shown by Trumbull in his "Princeton," 
  in his "Burgoyne" and in his "Cornwallis," it is the flag shown by Charles 
  Wilson Peale in his "Washington at Trenton." It is the flag ordered by 
  Washington to be made by Betsy Ross, the wife of a Master Mason, of whom a bit 
  of personal history is now in point.
   
  IN IOWA--THE ORIGINAL MASONIC 
  CERTIFICATE OF THE FLAG MAKER'S HUSBAND
   
  Betsy Griscom married John 
  Ross (57) a nephew of George Ross, signer of the Declaration of Independence. 
  He lost his life in the service of his country, January, 1776, only a short 
  time before Betsy made the first flag. Betsy married Captain Ashburn in 1777. 
  He was soon captured and in a few years died a prisoner of war in Mill Prison, 
  near Portsmouth, England. John Claypoole, a lineal descendant of Oliver 
  Cromwell, (58) had been his friend and fellow prisoner. When released from 
  prison, Claypoole returned to his home in Philadelphia and delivered to Betsy 
  the keepsakes and last message sent by her husband. Later John Claypoole 
  married Betsy, a union blessed with a family of four daughters.
   
  Betsy Ross-Claypoole 
  continued the flag making for her new husband who like those she had 
  heretofore taken, had devoted his life to the service of his country, had been 
  wounded at Germantown and long confinement in Mill Prison had broken his 
  health. So as the bread winner, Betsy Ross-Claypoole continued to make flags 
  until 1827 when she turned the business over to her daughter Mrs. Clarissa 
  Sidney Wilson who in turn continued it until 1857, when she moved to Fort 
  Madison, Iowa Here ended all known record, so I wrote Brother L R. Traverse, 
  P. M. of Claypoole Lodge of Fort Madison, for further information about the 
  descendants of Betsy Ross-Claypoole. In response I received a letter from Mary 
  C. Albright Robinson saying her great grandfather John Claypoole was a Mason 
  and that she had his Masonic certificate under seal of the Grand Lodge of 
  Pennsylvania--that it is written on vellum and in English, French and Italian. 
  Here was something worth while. And immediately I got secretary A. C. Rowland 
  on the long distance cable tow and urged him to secure the loan of that 
  certificate--a most rare find. Here it is in Fig. 33 (Frontispiece, August), 
  the actual certificate of the soldier husband of the flag maker. It is dated 
  March 30, 1780, and was issued on a request accompanied by the following 
  certificate:
   
  "Chester Town, 17th Dec., 
  1779. (59)
   
  "I do hereby certify that Mr. 
  John Claypoole was regularly entered, passed and raised in Lodge No. 7, at 
  "Chester Town, Maryland.
   
  "By Order of the Master.
   
  Signed "James Claypoole, 
  Secy. Lodge No. 7."
   
  Pennsylvania had previously 
  constituted a number of lodges in Kent County on the "eastern shore of 
  Maryland" of which No. 7 was one, hence the petition. Issued 136 years ago, it 
  is a little the worse for wear, but 
   
  "Little of all we value here
  Wakes on the morn of its 
  hundredth year
  Without both feeling and 
  looking queer--
  In fact there is nothing that 
  keeps its youth 
  So far as I know but our flag 
  and truth."
   
  Therefore, this flag shown in 
  Fig. 32, being of the series made by the Mason's wife, is cherished because of 
  that association but it is also cherished because it is an actual battle flag, 
  and the only one now left, carried in the war of the Revolution. It is the 
  flag of the Third Maryland regiment commanded by Bro. John Eager Howard (60) 
  at the battle of Cowpens, Jan. 17, 1791, and was carried by William Bachelor, 
  who, being wounded was sent to his home in Baltimore, but was allowed to take 
  his flag with him. His death soon followed and the flag was inherited by his 
  son, William Bachelor, Jr., who carried that same flag against the same old 
  enemy again during the War of 1812 in the battle of North Point near 
  Baltimore. (61) After the War of 1812, William Bachelor carried this flag on 
  many gala occasions as an attraction. Finally in 1907 it came into the keeping 
  of the state of Maryland in trust for the people of the whole United States. 
  All honor to Maryland-- well is she guarding her trust. Finally this flag is 
  cherished because it is the victory flag used in that pivotal battle of 
  Cowpens of which Avery said:
   
  "In point of tactics, the 
  battle of Cowpens was THE most brilliant battle of the war." (62) It was the 
  turning point leading directly to the surrender of Cornwallis at Yorktown nine 
  months later, when occurred a most rare bit of retributive justice. But a year 
  before, General Benjamin Lincoln had been driven to a humiliating surrender by 
  Cornwallis at Charleston. Now Washington directed that the sword of Cornwallis 
  should be delivered to Benjamin Lincoln--a brother who eight years before had 
  been raised to the sublime degree of a Master Mason in St. Andrew's Lodge at 
  Boston, Mass. (63) Therefore this "Old GLORY No. 1" is cherished above other 
  flags because it commemorates the devotion of the patriotic flag maker, the 
  wife of a Mason, whose descendants are today honored citizens of our own Iowa; 
  it is cherished because it commemorates the devotion of Masons to liberty in 
  the defense of which they surrendered their lives rather than betray their 
  trust; finally it is cherished because it is the victory flag leading directly 
  to that final surrender of Cornwallis to Washington and his Masonic brothers 
  in arms at Yorktown. Therefore, as in the beginning and all through the 
  strife, so it was at the close, Masonry was in the saddle and the sword of the 
  vanquished first opposed by Masons at Lexington, Concord and Bunker Hill was 
  now directed by a Mason to be delivered into the hands of a Mason. Well, did 
  he receive it not only in token of the surrender of Cornwallis, but as 
  signalizing the final triumph of the TILER in putting out of the new nation 
  all cowans and eavesdroppers. May we be ever mindful that the first great care 
  of Masons is to see that the Lodge of The Nation is duly tiled to the end that 
  all cowans may be kept out.
   
  MASONRY IN THE HOMES BEHIND 
  THE SOLDIERS
   
  Had the Revolution been a 
  soldiers' war only, this story would end here, but the fact is it was a 
  Masons' war as well and there were Masons outside of the army working "without 
  any tool of iron" and what they wrought fitted with remarkable exactness into 
  the things wrought in "the clay grounds" by Washington and his generals. The 
  printed proceedings of the grand jurisdictions of the several states give many 
  names which when followed through into their connection with the events of 
  their time show what seems wonderful "team work." It suggests a wide field of 
  Masonic Research. Following are a few illustrative of the many -all reproduced 
  from Lossing's Cyclopedia of U. S. History.
   
  Here are six governors 
  respectively of Virginia, North Carolina, New Hampshire, South Carolina and 
  New Jersey, honors which came to these brothers as a recognition of their 
  efforts for liberty through the long struggle and everyone of them rich in 
  Masonic honors. On the bench, in Congress and in the state legislature, the 
  team work was consistent and persistent. Further illustrating the fact, here 
  in No. 47, is Grand Master Marshall, Chief Justice of the United States 
  Supreme Court. As a boy he followed his father in the Revolution and was fit 
  inspiration for the well known picture, "The Spirit of '76." While he was 
  Grand Master he laid corner stones with the lodge opened on the First Degree 
  only.
   
  IN CONGRESS THE PEN WROTE 
  WHAT THE SWORD WROUGHT
   
  Peyton Randolph, Grand Master 
  of Virginia, was president of the first Congress in 1774, and from that date 
  to the final victory Masonry continued to be a dominating influence at each 
  and every session of Congress. The place of meeting was the old state house 
  known as Independence Hall--Philadelphia.
   
  There are many shrines of 
  American liberty but perhaps none more revered. In No. 49 you see it as it 
  appears today, with the Statue of Bro. Washington in front.
   
  But if you could go back to 
  1776--and then around to the other or Walnut Street side of it, you would see 
  it as shown in No. 50.
   
  David Rittenhouse had erected 
  the tower to observe the transit of Venus and it was used to herald the 
  proclamation of Mars. Here hung the "Liberty Bell" to "proclaim liberty 
  throughout the land to all the inhabitants thereof." The tower has been made 
  higher --the clock taken from the end and placed in the tower, while the bell 
  is carefully treasured in Independence room. Here Independence was declared. 
  Here Congress sat during the Revolution and here a Massachusetts Mason, Bro. 
  John Hancock, succeeded Peyton Randolph as president. But the crowning glory 
  of the old building, erected in 1736, was the formation there of the 
  Constitution of the United States under the guidance of Bro. Washington as 
  chairman and Bro. Benjamin Franklin, a Grand Master of Pennsylvania.
   
  Benjamin Franklin both at 
  home and abroad did more by his wisdom and diplomatic skill than any other one 
  Mason, Washington alone excepted, to place Old Glory high among the nations. 
  He helped make both the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution and 
  is a signer of both documents. In the treaty of peace in 1783, he secured such 
  favorable concessions as to astound the nations of Europe and they were not 
  slow to manifest their displeasure. It was a rare triumph of American 
  diplomatic skill, seldom equaled and never exceeded even in our one hundred 
  years of brilliant achievement. Well did he use the trowel.
   
  THE MASTER'S CHAIR
   
  The most historic furniture 
  in America now in Independence Hall, Philadelphia, consists of the two pieces 
  shown in No. 53. Elson says: "These two pieces of furniture were used for both 
  the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. On the chair a half sun 
  is carved." (65) When the Constitution was being signed, Franklin said with a 
  meaning well understood, referring to the half-sun emblazoned on the center of 
  the back of the chair here shown, "Painters have found it difficult to paint a 
  sun near the horizon so as to tell whether it was a setting or rising sun, 
  but," said he, "after the Constitution had been passed and the members were 
  signing, I looked at the sun behind President Washington and I saw for the 
  first time it was a rising sun." (66) In very truth may we not call this the 
  Master's Chair? From this chair the pen wrote what the sword wrought. As the 
  sun rises in the east to govern the day so rose the Constitution in the east 
  to govern the nation with equal justice and regularity.
   
  "SECOND TO NONE IN PRIVATE 
  LIFE"
   
  When the war was over, 
  Washington returned to his farm but never for a moment did he cease to be 
  actively true to that vow he made to his officers on that memorable day in the 
  "Temple" when he faced the ruffians. From 1783 to 1789 when there was only the 
  semblance of a government, Washington's course endeared him more and more to 
  every true patriot. His character was so aptly described by Bro. Henry Lee in 
  a single sentence known the world over. How often you have heard the first 
  part of that renowned sentence --and alas, how seldom the second! Here is the 
  full sentence:--"First in War, first in peace, and first in the hearts of his 
  countrymen, HE WAS SECOND TO NONE IN THE HUMBLE AND ENDEARING SCENES OF 
  PRIVATE LIFE." "Second to none in private life," in itself may not have made 
  him president but it did give him the distinction of being the only one ever 
  elected president of the United States by unanimous vote. Washington was 
  inaugurated President at New York April 30, 1789. Grand Master Robert 
  Livingston administered the oath of office to him using a Bible from St. 
  John's Lodge. Well did he remember the vow he voluntarily made to his officers 
  on that memorable 15th of March, 1783. Here is his first cabinet--all Masons 
  but Jefferson. He appointed no one but those he considered best able to serve 
  the country, but among the men he knew so well in other scenes, he found the 
  right kind of nerve and loyalty to promote the best interest of all.
   
  In the second office in power 
  was an honored Mason of Philadelphia, (68) the Hon. F. A. Muhlinberg, Speaker 
  of the House. Thus was "Old Glory" again sponsored by those taught to yield 
  their lives rather than their honor.
   
  FIRST NATIONAL CORNER STONE 
  LAYING
   
  September 18, 1793, the 
  corner stone of the new capitol at Washington was laid by the Grand Lodge of 
  Maryland, Washington using the trowel, which is a treasured relic of 
  Alexandria Washington Lodge No. 22. In the description, two odd things occur 
  as they appear to us now, first, the stone was laid in SOUTHEAST corner and 
  second, in the grand procession was a place for
   
  "1. Masons of the first 
  degree
  2. Masons of the second 
  degree
  3. Masons of the third 
  degree."
   
  The event is commemorated in 
  one of the panels of the Crawford Bronze Doors, which open from the Senate 
  Vestibule upon the portico. This is the north wing of the Capitol. The door is 
  double with eight panels, each of which commemorates in high relief an 
  important event in the life of our country. The door was designed by an 
  American sculptor, Thomas Crawford.
   
  'Tis well, yea 'tis meet and 
  propel that our brothers of 1776 should be thus commemorated in undying bronze 
  in the inner chamber of the national capitol at Washington. But me thinks that 
  if these bronze lips could but speak to us we would hear familiar 
  words--thus--"Go therefore and may the blessing of God attend you. Heretofore 
  you have had brothers to speak and do for you. Now you must speak and do for 
  yourselves and for those to follow you--even as we have done. We leave you the 
  working tools bright from service--here is the emblem "Old Glory" with a star 
  for every state. Go, see ye to it that there shall ever a state FOR EVERY 
  star." 
   
  So mote it ever be.
   
   
  (56) Vide Battle Flags in 
  State House Md. Clinton L. Riggs p. 5
  (57) Vide Canby's & Lloyd 
  Balderston Evolution of the American Flag, p. 104-5. 
  (58) Vide Preble p. 265.
  
  (59) Vide Old Masonic Lodges 
  of Pa. Julius F. Sachse p. 210. 
  (60) Vide Shultz History of 
  Freemasonry in Maryland, Vol 1, p. 67, says that a picture of Bro. John Eager 
  Howard hung in a Baltimore Lodge room; that his son B.C. Howard also a general 
  was a Grand Master of Masons in Md. Later John Eager Howard was governor & 
  U.S. Senator. 
  (61) Battle Flags in the 
  State House, Annapolis, Md., p. 5. 
  (62) Vide Avery, V. 6, p. 
  288. 
  (63) Vide Centennial Memorial 
  St. Andrew's Lodge, p. 112. 
  (64) Vide Elson's History of 
  the United States, V. 2. 
  (65) Vide Elson's History of 
  the United States, V. 2. 
  (66) Vide Elson's History of 
  the United States, V. 2, p. XVI.
  (67) Vide Washington Man and 
  Mason. 
  (68) Member Lodge No. 3 Vide 
  Old Lodges of Penn. by Julius F. Sachse, p. 248. 
  (69) Vide Washington, Man and 
  Mason. 
  (70) Hired Handy of 
  Washington. D. C., to make for Research Committee
   
  THE FIVE POINTS SYMBOLISM
   
  1. Foot to foot that we may 
  go, 
  Where our help we can bestow;
  
  Pointing out the better way,
  Lest our brothers go astray.
  
  Thus our steps should always 
  lead 
  To the souls that are in 
  need.
   
  2. Knee to knee, that we may 
  share 
  Every brother's needs in 
  prayer: 
  Giving all his wants a place,
  
  When we seek the throne of 
  grace. 
  In our thoughts from day to 
  day 
  For each other we should 
  pray.
   
  3. Breast to breast, to there 
  conceal, 
  What our lips must not 
  reveal; 
  When a brother does confide,
  
  We must by his will abide.
  
  Mason's secrets to us known,
  
  We must cherish as our own.
   
  4. Hand to back, our love to 
  show 
  To the brother, bending low:
  
  Underneath a load of care,
  
  Which we may and ought to 
  share. 
  That the weak may always 
  stand, 
  Let us lend a helping hand.
   
  5. Cheek to cheek, or mouth 
  to ear, 
  That our lips may whisper 
  cheer, 
  To our brothel in distress:
  
  Whom our words can aid and 
  bless. 
  Warn him if he fails to see,
  
  Dangers that are known to 
  thee.
   
  6. Foot to foot, and knee to 
  knee, 
  Breast to breast, as brothers 
  we: 
  Hand to back and mouth to 
  ear, 
  Then that mystic word we 
  hear, 
  Which we otherwise conceal,
  
  But on these five points 
  reveal.
   
  --N. A. McAulay.
   
  REGIMENTAL LODGES
   
  BY BRO. C. M. SCHENCK, 
  COLORADO
   
  UNDER the above caption in 
  the May number of The Builder, Bro. J. L. Carson says, "Two lodges accompanied 
  the American Army during the Mexican War, while over a hundred dispensations 
  for lodges are supposed to have been issued during the Civil War," and 
  continues, "Cannot some of our grand old veterans tell us something of some of 
  these ?"
   
  The writer, the son of a 
  veteran over whose grave in Mount Hope Cemetery, Topeka, Kansas, stands a 
  stone on which is inscribed:
   
  "Maj. W. L. Schenck Late 
  Surgeon 17th O. V. I.  1825-1910"
   
  submits the following from 
  the October, 1862, issue of the Masonic Review, published at Cincinnati, Ohio:
   
  An Ohio Army Lodge. Head 
  Quarters 17th O. V. I.
   
  Camp Schoepf, on Elk River, 
  Tennessee, Aug. 15, 1862.
   
  "Bro. Moore:--When our army 
  was encamped on the field of Shiloh, in this State, the 17th Ohio was there, 
  and by virtue of a dispensation from the Grand Master of the Grand Lodge of 
  Free and Accepted Masons of Ohio, duly granted to Bro. Bonham H. Fox, W.M., 
  Jno. Stinchcomb, S.W., D.M. Rex, J. W., and several other Brethen, a 
  Regimental Lodge of Free and Accepted Masons was duly organized and called 
  "Ward Lodge," in honor of our gallant Major, Durbin Ward. We organized near 
  the place where General Beauregard's Head Quarters were during the bloody 
  fight of the 6th and 7th of April last.
   
  The officers elected were: 
  Bro. Durbin Ward, Treasurer, W.L. Schenck, Secretary, Robert Gates, S.D., Owen 
  W. Brown, J.D., ____ Sharp, Tyler.
   
  "We keep our Lodge with us, 
  and when we can't get a Lodge room, we meet on the 'highest hills,' or in the 
  'lowest vales.' We have spent many pleasant evenings together in the Lodge, 
  but find many inconveniences you would little think of, unless you were with 
  us. Sometimes we are on the march the night of our regular meeting, and so 
  continue for several days, but as we are nearly all in our Regiment, we can 
  call a meeting with but little trouble. We have done considerable work, and 
  have to take advantage of our short stays at camps, to work.
   
  "At Tuscumbia, also, we met 
  several times in the Masons' Hall? which brethren there kindly gave into our 
  charge. There is that romance and oddity about a Lodge of Masons meeting under 
  such circumstances, that I am sure you would enjoy it.
   
  "Our Colonel, J. M. Connell, 
  was the first applicant, and has the honor of having been made a Mason on the 
  battle-field of Shiloh.
   
  "Our Tyler, Bro. Sharp, died 
  at Corinth in hospital, a few days since, and Bro. Rex, our Junior Warden, 
  formerly of Rushville Lodge, when on a scout with the Regiment, injured 
  himself so badly as to produce rupture, and he by reason thereof has been 
  compelled to resign. We lose two valuable officers thereby in the Lodge, and 
  also in the Regiment. Bro. Sharp commenced in the ranks, but by his virtues 
  and conduct as a soldier merited and received promotion, and died a Captain. I 
  may give you an item occasionally.
   
  "Fraternally yours, (Signed) 
  Jno. Stinchcomb."
   
  In his declining years my 
  father, at the request of his children, wrote at considerable length 
  "Recollections of his Life and Times" from which I copy references to this 
  Ohio Army Lodge, and to Captain Stinchcomb.
   
  "My regiment slowly advanced 
  toward Corinth to take its place in the grand army under General Halleck that 
  was following the rebels who had retreated to that point from Pittsburg 
  Landing. One of the pleasant events in the regiment was the meetings on 
  convenient occasions of Ward Lodge A. F. and A. M. working under dispensation 
  from the state of Ohio. We were going to have such a meeting in one of my 
  hospital tents on the way to Corinth, and I went over to General Schoepf's 
  quarters to invite his medical director, Surgeon Strew, to meet with us. After 
  doing so, he asked, 'Why don't you invite the General?' who stood near us. I 
  replied, 'Because I don't know him as a Mason.' And addressing him, I asked, 
  'Are you a Mason, General ?' He replied, 'I am.' Then I said, 'We would be 
  glad to have you meet with us.'
   
  "From this point, 
  (Winchester, Tenn.) the army moved eastward to the foot of the Tennessee 
  Mountains where I recall two or three incidents out of the common line of army 
  life. . . . We were encamped in the edge of a thick woods and in cleaning out 
  the underbrush the craftsmen of my regiment volunteered to make a lodge room 
  in the open field in front of us by enclosing an oblong square with proper 
  ante-rooms, the walls being so thickly brushed that the lights within could 
  not be seen from without, and here Ward Lodge U.D. held several meetings, at 
  some of which General George H. Thomas, General Thomas L. Crittenden, General 
  Alvin Schoepf, and other officers and soldiers exchanged fraternal greetings.
   
  "A four horse ambulance, 
  belonging to my regiment, whose upper story had given out, had been fixed a la 
  omnibus, and one of the boards along its sides was supported at one end by a 
  box containing the 'working tools' of Ward Lodge A. F. & A. M. This being 
  reported by my amiable assistant, who, like the newly appointed medical 
  director, was an anti-mason, the latter lost no time in coming to enquire of 
  me what was in the boxes that held up my omnibus seat.
   
  "I said, 'Some of them 
  contain air, and in one there is a square and compasses, a plumb and trowel, 
  and sundry other like articles.'
   
  "He said, 'I will give you 
  just five minutes to take that box out of your ambulance.'
   
  "I rode forward to Major 
  Ward, W.M. of Ward Lodge U.D. and together we reported the facts to General 
  Schoepf, who said, 'It is my order you keep that box where you got him. I 
  report him to General Thomas.'
   
  "During the afternoon the 
  medical director came along again and asked if I had removed that box.
   
  "I said, 'No it is still on 
  duty.'
   
  "'Didn't I say I would give 
  you five minutes in which to remove it?'
   
  "'Yes, and I believe I said I 
  would take the five minutes.'
   
  "'So you mean to disobey my 
  orders?'
   
  "'I do.'
   
  "'I'll report you to the 
  General.'
   
  "'Please do.'
   
  "It is needless to say I 
  never heard anything more about removing the box.
   
  "While my regiment was made 
  up in a distant part of the state, Fairfield and the adjoining counties, and 
  the men all strangers to me excepting Major Durbin Ward, who was from Warren 
  County, when I went home on furlough from Somerset, Kentucky, four of my 
  personal friends, and members of my Masonic lodge, Eastern Star No. 55, R.F. 
  and George Ireland, John Gage and Stephen Corwin went back with me and were 
  mustered into Company B., Captain Stinchcomb, all serving until the close of 
  the war."
   
  My father, from whose 
  writings the extracts are taken, was made a Mason in Eastern Star Lodge No. 
  55, F. & A. M., at Franklin, Ohio, in the year 1848, and was its Master in 
  1850. Of this Lodge, instituted in 1819, his uncle, William C. Schenck, was 
  the first Master, and his father, Garret A. Schenck, the first Junior Warden.
   
  At the time of his death, 
  which occurred at Topeka, Kansas, in 1910, he was a member of Siloam Lodge No. 
  225, A. F. & A. M., Topeka, and Topeka Commandery No. 5, K. T. His funeral 
  services were conducted by this Commandery.
   
  "THE VOICE OF THE GUNS"
   
  Never, perhaps, was lyric 
  more bitterly born than Gilbert Frankau's stirring "A Song of the Guns." two 
  stanzas of which herewith are given. Thus its prefatory note:
   
  The author, who is now 
  serving in Flanders, was present at the battle of Loos, and during a lull in 
  the fighting--when the gunners, who had been sleepless for five nights, were 
  resting like tired dogs under their guns--he jotted down the main theme of the 
  poem. After the battle the artillery brigade to which he was attached was 
  ordered to Ypres, and it was during the long trench warfare in this district, 
  within sight of the ruined tower of Ypres Cathedral, that the poem was finally 
  completed. The last three stanzas were written at midnight in brigade 
  headquarters, with the German shells screaming over the ruined town.
   
  We are the guns and your 
  masters ! Saw ye our flashes ?  Heard ye the scream of our shells in the night 
  and the shuddering crashes? Saw ye our work by the roadside, the gray wounded 
  lying, Moaning to God that He made them--the maimed and the dying? Husbands or 
  sons, Fathers or lovers, we break them ! We are the guns !  We are the guns 
  and ye serve us ! Dare ye grow weary,  Steadfast at nighttime, at noontime; or 
  waking, when dawn winds blow dreary Over the fields and the flats and the 
  reeds of the barrier water, To wait on the hour of our choosing the minute 
  decided for slaughter? Swift the clock runs; Yes, to the ultimate second. 
  Stand to your guns !
   
   
   
  THE MESSAGE OF THE BUDDHA 
  From an Ancient Manuscript.
   
  "Hate is a cruel word. If men 
  hate you, regard it not; and you can turn the hate of men to love and mercy 
  and good will, and mercy is as large as all the heavens.
   
  "And there is good enough for 
  all. With good destroy the bad; with generous deeds make avarice ashamed; with 
  truth make straight the crooked lines that error draws, for error is but truth 
  distorted, gone astray.
   
  "And pain will follow him who 
  speaks or acts with evil thoughts, as does the wheel the foot of him who draws 
  the cart.
   
  "He is a greater man who 
  conquers self than he who kills a thousand men in war.
   
  "He is a noble man who is 
  himself what he believes that other men should be.
   
  "Return to him who does you 
  wrong your purest love, and he will cease from doing wrong; for love will 
  purify the heart of him who is beloved as truly as it purifies the heart of 
  him who loves." 
   
  ----o----
   
  A COURSE OF MASONIC READING
  BY BRO. ROD'K H. BAXTER, 
  MANCHESTER, ENG.
   
  (Herewith we reproduce a list 
  of books suggested for a course of Masonic reading, by the secretary of the 
  Manchester Association for Masonic Research, to which we have ventured to add 
  a few American books. Most heartily we recommend this reading course, (1) 
  because the books named are authentic and trustworthy, giving in a popular 
  form the results of the best Masonic research; (2) because they are, for the 
  most part, inexpensive, and might easily be owned by any Lodge having an 
  interest in Masonic Study; and (3) because a list of this kind will answer 
  many inquiries which have come to ye editor. Later we propose to publish like 
  lists dealing with other branches and rites of Masonry not included in the 
  present course.)
   
  "Knowledge is the solace of 
  the intellect as religion is the comfort of the soul. And its acquisition is 
  not a toil but an indescribable delight." - G.W. Speth.
   
  INQUIRIES from young members 
  of the Association have been so frequent as to what books should be read to 
  enable them to acquire a proper knowledge of the craft, that the Council have 
  decided to issue a curriculum, and have entrusted me with the preparation of 
  the work - a task which I undertake with much pleasure.
   
  Bro. Speth, than whom there 
  could be no safer guide, published a curriculum for English readers in 1890, 
  in Vol. III of the Transactions of the Quatuor Coronati Lodge (Ars Quatuor 
  Coronatorum), and in 1901 prepared an admirable and much more extensive list 
  of works, suitable for American brethren, with a running commentary, forming a 
  delightful essay, which was published at Detroit, Michigan, in 1901. It would 
  be presumptuous on my part to endeavor in any way to improve on this work, 
  were it not for the fact that so many fresh Masonic books have appeared since 
  that date as to render a revision necessary, but I ought to add that my 
  compilation is not merely a bringing up to date of Bro. Speth's list, but a 
  fresh plan, which I consider the circumstances of the case require.
   
  Bro. Dr. Chetwode Crawley, in 
  the introduction to his Caementaria Hibernica, says that there are three 
  classical works which are absolutely indispensable to all Masonic students, 
  viz:- (1) Gould's History of Freemasonry, (2) Hughan's Origin of the English 
  Rite of Freemasonry, and (3) Sadler's Masonic Facts and Fictions. Whilst fully 
  appreciating the value of these works, I would not, however, suggest that the 
  student should begin by reading them in the order given. The great history of 
  Gould is too ponderous to be attractive, and necessary as it is to every 
  library, I would rather class it as a work of reference than as a book likely 
  to encourage a taste for Masonic literature. One serious fault the work 
  possesses - it has never been brought up to date - and despite the fact that 
  so many so-called fresh editions have appeared, the text so far as I am able 
  to ascertain, has never been revised.
   
  My own suggestion is that 
  instead of entering on a course of advanced reading, the beginner should 
  procure some of the more recently published "tabloid" works at reasonable 
  prices, which, when properly assimilated, should create such a desire for 
  further knowledge, that he would not then grudge the expenditure of time and 
  money in acquiring it. I hope I may not be considered too egotistical in first 
  of all mentioning a small work of my own, "General and Historic Notes on 
  Freemasonry" (James Clegg, Rochdale, 1s., or, post free, 1s. 2d.), in which I 
  may hasten to add, I have no financial interest whatever, as being probably 
  the cheapest work available. Next in order I would recommend the works in the 
  following list:
   
  The Master Mason's Hand Book, 
  by F.J.W. Crowe. (G. Kenning and Son, London. 1s. 6d.)
   
  Things a Freemason Should 
  Know, by F.J.W. Crowe. (Kenning, London. 2s. 6d.)
   
  Freemasonry before the 
  Existence of Grand Lodges, by Lionel Vibert. (Spencer and Co., London. 4s. 
  6d.)
   
  A Short Masonic History, by 
  Fredk. Armitage. (Weare and Co., London. 2 vols., 4s. 6d. each.)
   
  The Comacines: Their 
  Predecessors and Successors, by W. Ravenscroft. (Elliot Stock, London, 3s. 
  6d.)
   
  The Builders, by J. F. 
  Newton. (National Masonic Research Society, Anamosa, Iowa. $1.50.)
   
  Having-carefully perused the 
  above primers, the student will have acquired an elementary knowledge of 
  Masonic history, but those desirous of more light ought certainly next to 
  read:-
   
  A Concise History of 
  Freemasonry, by R.F. Gould. (Gale and Polden, London. 10s. 6d.)
   
  The History of Freemasonry, 
  by J.G. Findel. English translation. (Kenning, London. 5s.)
   
  It is time now to provide 
  one's self with an encyclopedia of some kind, and following the precedent 
  already adopted, the following list gives the works in the order of 
  simplicity.
   
  A Concise Cyclopedia of 
  Freemasonry, by E.L. Hawkins. (A. Lewis, London. 4s. 6d.)
   
  Kenning's Cyclopedia of 
  Freemasonry, edited by the Rev. A.F.A. Woodford. (Kenning, London. Originally 
  10s 6d., but now about 2s. 6d.)
   
  Mackey's Lexicon of 
  Freemasonry. (Second-hand, about 5s.)
   
  Kenneth R. H. Mackenzie's 
  Royal Masonic Cyclopedia. (Second-hand, about 12s. 6d.)
   
  Dr. A. G. Mackey's 
  Encyclopedia, edited by E. L. Hawkins and W. J. Hughan. (A. Lewis, London. 2 
  vols., 50s.)
   
  Under this heading, perhaps, 
  ought to be classed Gould's great work:-
   
  The History of Freemasonry. 
  (Jack, London. 6 half vols., :1883-7. Published at 3 pounds 15s., but now 
  second-hand for about 15s.)
   
  Before dipping into other 
  works of reference, I suggest that the following works be read:
   
  The Origin of the English 
  Rite of Freemasonry, by Wm. Jas. Hughan. Second edition. (Research Lodge, 
  Leicester. 10s. 6d.)
   
  Masonic Facts and Fiction, by 
  Hy. Sadler. (Second-hand, about 15s.)
   
  Masonic Reprints and 
  Historical Revelations, by Hy. Sadler. (Kenning, London. 5s. 6d.)
   
  The introduction to the 
  last-named work, by Bro. Chetwode Crawley is one of the finest pieces of 
  Masonic writing that I have ever come across, and in my opinion ought to be 
  read by every Mason, whether a student of craft lore or not.
   
  For special study the works 
  under the various headings hereafter given may be consulted.
   
  GUILD LIFE
   
  The theory that our ancient 
  lodges were in some way connected with the various guilds, amounts to 
  something stronger than a mere possibility, so that a knowledge of these early 
  organizations is desirable. Many good works have been issued on the subject, 
  but a study of the following will suffice:-
   
  English Gilds, by Toulmin 
  Smith, with a fine Introduction by Brentano.
   
  Two Thousand Years of Gild 
  Life, by the Rev. J. M. Lambert.
   
  The Cathedral Builders. The 
  Story of a Great Guild, by Leader Scott.
   
  Records of the Hole Craft and 
  Fellowship of Masons, by Edward Condel, Jr.
   
  Aberdeen Merchant Crafts and 
  Guilds, by Ebenezer Bain.
   
  The Incorporated Trades of 
  Edinburgh, by James Colston.
   
  TRADITION
   
  Most of the traditions of the 
  craft are dealt with in general Masonic literature, but the following little 
  work is of special interest:-
   
  The Symbols and Legends of 
  Freemasonry, by J. Finlay Finlayson. (Kenning, London. 3s. 6d.)
   
  Speculative Masonry, by A. S. 
  MacBride. (D. Gilfillan, Glasgow. $1.50.)
   
  SYMBOLISM AND ETHICS
   
  The peculiarly difficult 
  subject of symbolism is equally difficult to advise about, but I suggest:-
   
  The Perfect Ashlar, by the 
  Rev. J. T. Lawrence.
   
  The Keystone. Ibid.
   
  Sidelights on Freemasonry. 
  Ibid.
   
  Byways of Freemasonry. Ibid.
   
  The Etiquette of Freemasonry, 
  by an Old Past Master (i. e., Bro. Franklin Thomas.)
   
  (All published by A. Lewis, 
  London. 4s. 6d. per vol.) Symbolism of Masonry, by Dr. Mackey. (Macoy Co., New 
  York. $1.50.)
   
  JURISPRUDENCE
   
  The Book of Constitutions 
  should, of course, be in the hands of every Mason, and should be carefully 
  studied. No really good interpretation of the book has yet appeared. Oliver 
  and Paton have made more a less indifferent attempts, and the most recent 
  effort is:
   
  Masonic Jurisprudence, by the 
  Rev. J. T. Lawrence Second edition. (A Lewis, London. 7s. 6d.)
   
  But on no account should the 
  critique of the wor by Bro. Hextell be passed over, as some of the author's 
  conclusions are very seriously controverted.
   
  SCOTTISH HISTORY
   
  No country in the world is 
  richer in old lodges and their records than Scotland, and fortunately skilled 
  craftsmen have done full justice to the subject. The following works are all 
  good; but Murray Lyon's work is absolutely a classic, and must be consulted.
   
  History of the Lodge of 
  Edinburgh Mary's Chapel No. 1. Embracing an Account of the Rise and Progress 
  of Freemasonry in Scotland, by D. Murray Lyon. (Second-hand about 15s.)
   
  History of Canongate 
  Kilwinning Lodge, No. 2, by Allan Mackenzie. (Lodge No. 2. 7s. 6d.)
   
  History of the Ancient 
  Masonic Lodge of Scoon and Perth, by D. Crawford Smith. (Cowan and Ca Perth. 
  10s. 6d.)
   
  History of Freemasonry in 
  Roxburgh, Peebles, and Selkirkshires, by W. Fred Vernon. (Kenning, London. 
  4s.)
   
  IRISH HISTORY
   
  Ireland stood void of any 
  serious Masonic historical works until the advent of our distinguished Brother 
  W. J. Chetwode Crawley, but his brilliant talents have amply removed the 
  stigma. His three volumes of Irish Masonic Reprints are difficult to procure 
  at any price but cannot possibly be omitted from any list of books for Masonic 
  students.
   
  Caementaria Hibernica, by W.J. 
  Chetwode Crawley. Fasciculus I.
   
  NUMBERS AND CHANGES OF LODGES
   
  Bro. Jno. Lane, of Torquay, 
  inspired doubtless by Bro. Hughan, earned the distinction of being the 
  statistician of the craft par excellence, and although his works can scarcely 
  be styled attractive, they must certainly be regarded as monuments of 
  research.
   
  The Four Old Lodges and Their 
  Descendants, by R.F. Gould. (Spencer and Co., London. 5s. 6d.)
   
  The Atholl Lodges, by R. F. 
  Gould. (Spence London. 3s. 6d.)
   
  Numerical and Numismatical 
  Register of Lodge by W. J. Hughan. (Second-hand, 1 pound. 1s.)
   
  Handy Book to the Lists of 
  Lodges, by Jno. Lan (Kenning, London. 6s. 6d.)
   
  Masonic Records, 1717-1887, 
  by Jno. Lane.
   
  Do. Do. Second edition, 
  1717-1894. (Grand Lodge, 1 pound. 1s.)
   
  NUMISMATICS
   
  Leaving out of account the 
  eally works of Metzdorf, Zaccharias, and Marvin, which are difficult of 
  access, we have in the following list a series of very nice books.
   
  Hughan's Numerical and 
  Numismatical Register (already cited.)
   
  Centenary Warrants and 
  Jewels, by Jno. Lane. (Kenning, London. 10s. 6d.)
   
  The Medals of British 
  Freemasonry, by G. L. Shackles. (Q. C. Lodge. 12s. 6d.)
   
  ANCIENT MANUSCRIPTS
   
  To Bro. Wm. Jas. Hughan, the 
  craft is indebted for the most careful investigations on the ancient MS. 
  Constitutions, no roll having come to light during the past forty years 
  without his opinion having been consulted. Unfortunately his books are all out 
  of print and difficult to procure.
   
  The Old Charges of the 
  British Freemasons, by W. J. Hughan, with an Introduction by the Rev. 
  A.F.A.Woodford. (Second-hand, about 1 pound 1s.) Do. Do. (Second-hand, about 
  15s.)
   
  Ancient York Masonic Rolls, 
  with an Introduction by W. J. Hughan. (Second-hand, about 10s. 6d.)
   
  The first six volumes Quatuor 
  Coronatorum Antigrapha contain sumptuous facsimile reproductions of the most 
  important of the MS. Constitutions, with transcripts and commentaries, and 
  Vols. IX and X are equally valuable as containing reproductions of other early 
  writings.
   
  OLD BOOKS OF CONSTITUTIONS
   
  The early editions of the 
  Book of Constitutions are treasures eagerly sought for by collectors, and are 
  only purchasable at fancy prices. Fortunately their contents are available in 
  reprints, and no finer description of the whole series has ever been done than 
  that by Bro. Hughan in Vol. II of the Archaeological Library.
   
  Kenning's Archaeological 
  Library, Vol. I., edited by the Rev. A.F.A. Woodford, containing a (pretended) 
  facsimile reproduction of the premier Book of Constitutions, 1723. (Kenning, 
  London. 6s.)
   
  Do. Do. Vol. II. Edited by 
  W.J. Hughan, containing a facsimile reproduction of the Appendix, 1776, to the 
  1767 Constitutions. (Kenning, London. 6s.)
   
  Quatuor Coronatorum 
  Antigrapha, Vol. VII, containing a facsimile reproduction of the 1738 
  Constitutions. (Q. C. Lodge. 10s. 6d.)
   
  I am not aware of any 
  reprints of the Ahiman Rezon, the Book of Constitutions of the Ancients. Very 
  curious readings are to be found in the different editions of this work. 
  Copies of the 1778 and 1801 editions are in our own collection.
   
  BIBLIOGRAPHY
   
  It may seem strange even to 
  mention bibliographies as being readable books, but the first four catalogues 
  in the following list have been so carefully annotated by Bro. Hughan that 
  they are really interesting. The great work of Wolfstieg is the most complete 
  of the kind ever attempted.
   
  Catalogue of the Worcester 
  Masonic Exhibition, 1884. Edited by Bro. Geo. Taylor.
   
  Do. Do. Shanklin, 1886. 
  Edited by Alfred Greenham.
   
  Do. Do. Plymouth, 1887. 
  Edited by W. J. Hughan.
   
  Catalogue of the Worcester 
  Masonic Library and Museum, 1891. Edited by Bro. Geo. Taylor. (Obtainable from 
  F. L. Gardner, Gunnersbury. 7s. 6d.)
   
  Bibliographie der 
  Freimaurerischen Literatur, by A. Wolfstieg, 1911-13. 3 vols.
   
  GENERAL
   
  Although my list has already 
  reached considerable length, I cannot possibly complete it without 
  particularly mentioning:-
   
  The Transactions of the 
  Quatuor Coronati Lodge, No. 2076. Vols. I to XXVI, which Bro. Hughan has 
  described as veritable mines of wealth. Other books which may with advantage 
  be consulted are:-
   
  Illustrations of Masonry, by 
  Wm. Preston. (Second-hand, about 5s.)
   
  The Spirit of Freemasonry, by 
  William Hutchinson. (Second-hand, about 7s. 6d.)
   
  Builders' Rites and 
  Ceremonies, by G. W. Speth. (Second-hand, 3s.)
   
  The Religion of Freemasonry, 
  by H.J. Whymper. (Second-hand, 7s. 6d.)
   
  Masonic Sketches and 
  Reprints, by W.J. Hughan. (Second-hand, 1 pound. 1s.)
   
  History of the Apollo Lodge, 
  York, Ibid. (Second hand, 5s.)
   
  The Jacobite Lodge at Rome, 
  1735-7, Ibid. (Research Lodge, Leicester. 7s. 6d.)
   
  History of the Emulation 
  Lodge of Improvement, by Hy. Sadler. (Kenning, London. 5s.)
   
  Memorials of the Globe Lodge 
  and Origin of the Red Apron, by Hy. Sadler. (Kenning, London. 4s.)
   
  Thomas Dunckerley: His Life, 
  Labours, and Letters. Ibid. (Kenning, London. 6s. 6d.)
   
  Military Lodges, by R. F. 
  Gould. (Gale and Polden, London. 5s.)
   
  French Prisoners' Lodges, by 
  J. T. Thorp. (Leicester. 5s.)
   
  The Philosophy of Masonry, by 
  Roscoe Pound, (National Masonic Research Society, Anamosa, Iowa. 76 cents.)
   
  Morals and Dogma, by Albert 
  Pike. $5.00.
   
  PERIODICAL LITERATURE
   
  It is quite essential for 
  every Brother, desirous of keeping himself in touch with the current doings of 
  the craft, to subscribe to some periodical. The "Freemason" and "Freemasons' 
  Chronicle" appear weekly, and the "Northern Freemason" monthly. I do not for a 
  minute suggest that these journals are of a high order of merit, but it must 
  be remembered that a more generous response from the Masonic public would 
  enable the proprietors to provide better and cheaper fare. A very useful 
  little publication is "Miscellanea Latomorum, or Masonic Notes and Queries," 
  edited by Bro. F. W. Levander, 30, North Villas, Camden Square, London, N. W. 
  (9 parts per annum for 5s.), which enables questions to be asked and generally 
  satisfactorily answered on altnost any branch of Freemasonry. 
   
  My strongest and last 
  recommendation to every intelligent Brother is to join the Correspondence 
  Circle of the Quatuor Coronati Lodge, the foremost literary lodge of the 
  world, where, for a joining fee of half-aguinea and an annual subscription of 
  like amount, he will receive the published transactions of the lodge, and be 
  entitled to all other advantages of membership, except holding office and 
  voting on matters of business. I say advisedly that it is necessary to join 
  this circle, and not merely to read some other subscriber's copies of the 
  publications, for it must be evident that a very large influx of subscriptions 
  is necessary to enable the work, which is so highly appreciated by the 
  foremost Masonic scholars in all parts of the world, to be carried on.
   
  ----o----
   
  SQUARE AND COMPASS
   
  WORSHIPFUL Master and 
  Brethren: Let us behold the glorious beauty that lies hidden beneath the 
  symbolism of the Square and Compass; and first as to the Square. Geometry, the 
  first and noblest of the sciences, is the basis on which the superstructure of 
  Masonry has been erected. As you know, the word "Geometry" is derived from two 
  Greek words which mean "to measure the earth," so that Geometry originated in 
  measurement; and in those early days, when land first began to be measured, 
  the Square, being a right angle, was the instrument used, so that in time the 
  Square began to symbolize the Earth. And later it began to symbolize, 
  Masonically, the earthly-in man, that is man's lower nature, and still later 
  it began to symbolize man's duty in his earthly relations, or his moral 
  obligations to his Fellowmen. The symbolism of the Square is as ancient as the 
  Pyramids. The Egyptians used it in building the Pyramids. The base of every 
  pyramid is a perfect square, and to the Egyptians the Square was their highest 
  and most sacred emblem. Even the Chinese many, many centuries ago used the 
  Square to represent Good, and Confucius in his writings speaks of the Square 
  to represent a Just man.
   
  As Masons we have adopted the 
  47th Problem of Euclid as the rule by which to determine or prove a perfect 
  Square. Many of us remember with what interest we solved that problem in our 
  school days. The Square has become our most significant Emblem. It rests upon 
  the open Bible on this altar; it is one of the three great Lights; and it is 
  the chief ornament of the Worshipful Master. There is a good reason why this 
  distinction has been conferred upon the Square. There can be nothing truer 
  than a perfect Square--a right angle. Hence the Square has become an emblem of 
  Perfection.
   
  Now a few words as to the 
  Compass: Astronomy was the second great science promulgated among men. In the 
  process of Man's evolution there came a time when he began to look up to the 
  stars and wonder at the vaulted Heavens above him. When he began to study the 
  stars, he found that the Square was not adapted to the measurement of the 
  Heavens. He must have circular measure; he needed to draw a circle from a 
  central point, and so the Compass was employed. By the use of the Compass man 
  began to study the starry Heavens, and as the Square primarily symbolized the 
  Earth, the Compass began to symbolize the Heavens, the celestial canopy, the 
  study of which has led men to think of God, and adore Him as the Supreme 
  Architect of the Universe. In later times the Compass began to symbolize the 
  spiritual or higher nature of man, and it is a significant fact that the 
  circumference of a circle, which is a line without end, has become an emblem 
  of Eternity and symbolizes Divinity; so the Compass, and the circle drawn by 
  the Compass, both point men Heavenward and Godward.
   
  The Masonic teaching 
  concerning the two points of the Compass is very interesting and instructive. 
  The novitiate in Masonry, as he kneels at this altar, and asks for Light sees 
  the Square, which symbolizes his lower nature, he may well note the position 
  of the Compass. As he takes another step, and asks for more Light, the 
  position of the Compass is changed somewhat, symbolizing that his spiritual 
  nature can, in some measure, overcome his evil tendencies. As he takes another 
  step in Masonry, and asks for further Light, and hears the significant words, 
  "and God said let there be Light, and there was Light," he sees the Compass in 
  new light; and for the first time he sees the meaning, thus unmistakably 
  alluding to the sacred and eternal truth that as the Heavens are higher than 
  the Earth, so the spiritual is higher than the material, and the spiritual in 
  man must have its proper place, and should be above his lower nature, and 
  dominate all his thoughts and actions. That eminent Philosopher, Edmund Burke, 
  once said, "It is ordained that men of intemperate passions cannot be free. 
  Their passions forge the chains which bind them, and make them slaves." Burke 
  was right. Masonry, through the beautiful symbolism of the Compass, tells us 
  how we can be free men, by permitting the spiritual within us to overcome our 
  evil tendencies, and dominate all our thoughts and actions. Brethren, 
  sometimes in the silent quiet hour, as we think of this conflict between our 
  lower and higher natures, we sometimes say in the words of another, "Show me 
  the way and let me bravely climb to where all conflicts with the flesh shall 
  cease. Show me that way. Show me the way up to a higher plane where my body 
  shall be servant of my Soul. Show me that way."
   
  Brethren, if that prayer 
  expresses desire of our hearts, let us take heed to the beautiful teachings of 
  the Compass, which silently and persistently tells each one of us, 
   
  "You should not in the valley 
  stay
  While the great horizons 
  stretch away 
  The very cliffs that wall you 
  round
  Are ladders up to higher 
  ground.
  And Heaven draws near as you 
  ascend, 
  The Breeze invites, the Stars 
  befriend. 
  All things are beckoning to 
  the Best,
  Then climb toward God and 
  find sweet Rest."
  --Bro. B. C. Ward, Iowa.
   
  ----o----
   
  NON-CHRISTIAN CANDIDATES
   
  BY A SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON 
  DISPENSATION, MASSACHUSETTS
   
  (Several Brethren have asked 
  of late about the admission of non-Christians in general, and of Buddhists in 
  particular, into the fellowship of Freemasonry. Pertinent to this important 
  question is the following report of a Committee appointed to deal with the 
  request for a Dispensation from the Grand Lodge of Massachusetts for 
  International Lodge at Pekin, China. The report is the work of a very able 
  Committee, of which Brother Roscoe Pound was a member, and he it was who 
  presented its findings to Grand Lodge. We take pleasure in reproducing the 
  report, as worthy of wide reading and long pondering, for that it stands so 
  squarely on the fundamental principle of Freemasonry, than which there is no 
  firmer basis for Freedom, Friendship and Fraternity among men.)
   
  In Grand Lodge, Boston, 
  December 8, 1915.
   
  The special committee 
  appointed to take under consideration the fourth and fifth questions discussed 
  in that part of the address of the M. W. Grand Master at the last Quarterly 
  Communication which has to do with the establishment of International Lodge at 
  Peking, China, begs to report as follows:
   
  Stated briefly, the first of 
  those questions is with reference to the eligibility of candidates who 
  subscribe to prevailing Oriental religions. This question may be considered 
  with respect to Oriental religions in general, but should also be looked at 
  with respect to Buddhists and followers of Confucius, since it is probable 
  that the matter, so far as this Grand Lodge is concerned, will be only 
  academic as to other creeds. In the case of Mohammedan, Hindu, and Parsee, the 
  question no longer admits of discussion. The practice of the United Grand 
  Lodge of England and its predecessors, undoubted for almost a century and a 
  half, would of itself suffice. In 1776, Umdat-ul-Umara, eldest son of the 
  Nabob of Arcot, was initiated at Trichinopoly in a Lodge under the 
  jurisdiction of the Provincial Grand Master for Madras. This reception of a 
  Mohammedan Prince was an event of such significance that it was made the 
  subject of congratulations by the Grand Lodge of England. The Parsees of 
  Western India, so Gould informs us, long ago took an active interest in 
  Masonry, and one of them, Brother Cama, was elected Grand Treasurer of the 
  Grand Lodge of England in 1886. With respect to Hindus, it seems that there 
  was an impression as late as 1860 that they were not eligible for Masonry, and 
  the initiation of a Brahman in Meridian Lodge No. 345, in that year raised a 
  vigorous discussion in the Masonic press. But it should be noted that the 
  discussion did not turn upon any supposed ineligibility of the adherents of 
  Oriental religions, but solely on the question whether the Brahman faith 
  involved belief in God, as Masons understand such belief. The arguments of the 
  Master of the Lodge was that "the very groundwork of the Brahman faith is the 
  belief in one Grand Superintending Being." (See Freemason's Magazine, April 
  21, September 8, October 13, 1860; May 18, 1861.) In 1861, two Sikh Princes 
  were initiated, and there does not appear to have been any doubt upon this 
  matter since that time. In 1874 a Hindu was Master of a Lodge under the 
  English constitutions. (See Gould, History of Freemasonry, III, 333, 336; 
  Mackey, History of Freemasonry, VII, 1892.)
   
  It would belie all our 
  professions of universality if this were not so. We must guard jealously the 
  Landmark--one of the few undoubted and universally admitted Landmarks--that 
  calls for belief in God, the Grand Architect of the Universe. In Brother 
  George F. Moore's well-known paper upon the subject he justly pronounces this 
  the first Landmark in Freemasonry. But the idea of God here is universal. Each 
  of us may interpret it in terms of his own creed. The requirement is not that 
  Masons adhere to this or that theological system or conceive of God in terms 
  of this or that creed. It is a simple requirement of belief in the One God, 
  however manifested, upon which philosophers and prophets and saints and the 
  enlightened religions of all time have been able to agree. It is enough to say 
  that we fully concur in the eloquent and convincing presentation of this 
  matter in the address of the Grand Master.
   
  Perhaps it is superfluous to 
  add anything to the argument from the practice of the premier Grand Lodge and 
  the argument from principle. But if any still harbor scruples it may be noted 
  that except for Hutchinson and Oliver, whose view that Masonry is a 
  distinctively Christian institution obviously can not be admitted, Masonic 
  scholars and teachers have been at one upon this point. In a passage afterward 
  quoted in Webb's Monitor Preston says: "The distant Chinese, the wild Arab, or 
  the American Savage will embrace a brother Briton [Webb adds "Frank or 
  German"] and he will know that beside the common ties of humanity there is 
  still a stronger obligation to engage him to kind or friendly offices." 
  (Illustrations of Masonry, Bk. 1, par. 3). Certainly we are not to suppose 
  that this Chinaman and this "wild" Arab are Christians. But Preston speaks 
  elsewhere in no uncertain tones: "The doctrine of one God, the creator and 
  preserver of the universe, has been their firm belief in every age; and under 
  the influence of that doctrine their conduct has been regulated through a long 
  succession of years. The progress of knowledge and philosophy, aided by divine 
  revelation, having abolished many of the vain superstitions of antiquity and 
  enlightened the minds of men with the knowledge of the true God and the sacred 
  tenets of the Christian faith, Masons have readily acquiesced in and zealously 
  pursued every measure which could promote a religion so wisely calculated to 
  make men happy. In those countries, however, where the gospel has not reached 
  and Christianity [has not] displayed her beauties, the Masons have pursued the 
  universal religion or the religion of nature; that is to be good men and true, 
  by whatever denomination or persuasion they have been distinguished; and by 
  this universal religion the conduct of the fraternity still continues to be 
  regulated." (Illustrations of Masonry, 2 ed., 154.) The Grand Master's address 
  has already quoted Mackey upon this subject. A score of passages from Albert 
  Pike might be quoted to the same effect. Let one suffice. After explaining 
  that "these ceremonies have one general significance to every one of every 
  faith who believes in God and the soul's immortality," he proceeds: "In no 
  other way could Masonry possess its character of universality; that character 
  which has ever been peculiar to it from its origin; and which enabled two 
  kings, worshippers of different Deities, to sit together as Masters while the 
  walls of the first temple arose." Finally, we may cite the words of Rev. 
  Joseph Fort Newton, which have the endorsement of the Grand Lodge of Iowa: 
  "While Masonry is theocratic in its faith and philosophy, it does not limit 
  its conception of the Divine, much less insist upon any one name for 'the 
  Nameless One of a hundred names.' Indeed, no feature of Masonry is more 
  fascinating than its age-long quest of the Lost Word, the Ineffable Name; a 
  quest that never tires, never tarries, knowing the while that every name is 
  inadequate, and all words are but symbols of a Truth too great for 
  words--every letter of the alphabet, in fact, having been evolved from some 
  primeval sign or signal of the faith and hope of humanity. Thus Masonry, so 
  far from limiting the thought of God, is evermore in search of a more 
  satisfying and revealing vision of the meaning of the universe, now luminous 
  and lovely, now dark and terrible; and it invites all men to unite in the 
  quest--
   
  One in the freedom of the 
  Truth, One in the joy of paths untrod, One in the soul's perennial Youth, One 
  in the larger thought of God.
   
  Truly the human consciousness 
  of fellowship with the Eternal, under whatever name, may well hush all words, 
  still more hush argument and anathema. Possession, not recognition, is the 
  only thing important; and if it is not recognized, the fault must surely be, 
  in large part, our own. Given the one great experience, and before long 
  kindred spirits will join in the "Universal Prayer" of Alexander Pope, himself 
  a Mason:
   
  Father of all ! in every age, 
  In every clime adored, By Saint, by Savage, and by Sage, Jehovah, Jove, or 
  Lord !"  (The Builders, 262-263.)
   
  It remains to consider 
  whether Buddhists and followers of Confucius are believers in God in such 
  sense that they may be made Masons. As to the former, we have the weighty 
  opinion of Albert Pike that Buddha was a "Masonic legislator"--that is that he 
  gave laws in the spirit of Masonry. He says of the original followers of 
  Buddha: "They recognized the existence of a single uncreated God, in whose 
  bosom everything grows, is developed and transformed" (Morals and Dogma, 277.) 
  Professor Rhys Davids, the chief authority in English upon Buddhism, indicates 
  that this may be a matter of dispute. But the committee does not deem it 
  necessary to go into this question, to which it is indeed scarcely competent. 
  For if any Buddhists are to be initiated in International Lodge they will be 
  required to profess belief in God at the outset, and as they will be men in 
  whom our Brethren have confidence and will come well recommended, we may be 
  assured that their professions will be sincere. The same point may be made 
  with respect to the followers of Confucius. But the Rev. J. Legge, an 
  unquestioned authority, tells us that while the teaching of Confucius "was 
  hardly more than a mere secularism" his predecessors on whom he built made 
  abundant reference to the Supreme Being and their writings contain "an 
  exulting awful recognition of Him as the almighty personal ruler who orders 
  the course of nature and providence." It seems clear that monotheists may 
  follow the ethical teachings of Confucius, even if sceptics may do so 
  likewise, and the former only will be elected to receive the mysteries of 
  Freemasonry.
   
  The second question, put 
  briefly, is with reference to the adaptability of our rites when applied to 
  adherents of Oriental religions. Here again we may appeal to the settled and 
  unquestioned practice of the United Grand Lodge of England. In response to a 
  request for information addressed to him by the R. W. Grand Secretary, Sir 
  Edward Letchworth, Grand Secretary of the English Grand Lodge, writes, under 
  date of October 25, 1915: "Adverting to your letter to me of the 11th instant, 
  it has always been the practice of this Grand Lodge to permit Candidates for 
  Freemasonry who are believers in a Supreme Being, but not in the Christian 
  Religion, to be obligated upon the Sacred Book of their own religion. Thus 
  Jews are obligated on the Old Testament, Mohammedans on the Koran, Hindus on 
  the Vedas, and Parsees on the Zendavesta."
   
  On principle this must be the 
  sound practice. It is indeed but a corollary of the proposition involved in 
  the first question. Moreover the testimony of Masonic scholars is clear. The 
  M. W. Grand Master has already quoted from Mackey's Masonic Jurisprudence. In 
  another work Dr. Mackey says: "Masonically the book of the law is that sacred 
  book which is believed by the Mason of any particular religion to contain the 
  revealed will of God; although technically among the Jews the Torah, or Book 
  of the Law, means only the Pentateuch or five books of Moses. Thus to the 
  Christian Mason the Book of the Law is the Old and New Testaments; to the Jew 
  the Old Testament; to the Mussulman the Koran; to the Brahman, the Vedas; and 
  to the Parsee the Zendavesta." In the Entered Apprentice Lecture, as written 
  by Albert Pike, he says: "The Holy Bible, Square, and (Compass, are not only 
  styled the Great Lights in Masonry, but they are also technically called the 
  Furniture of the Lodge; and, as you have seen, it is held that there is no 
  Lodge without them. This has sometimes been made a pretext for excluding Jews 
  from Our Lodges, because they can not regard the New Testament as a holy book. 
  The Bible is an indispensable part of the furniture of a Christian Lodge, only 
  because it is the sacred book of the Christian religion. The Hebrew Pentateuch 
  in a Hebrew Lodge, and the Koran in a Mohammedan one, belong on the Altar; and 
  one of these, and the Square and Compass, properly understood, are the Great 
  Lights by which a Mason must walk and work.
   
  "The obligation of the 
  candidate is always to be taken on the sacred book or books of his religion, 
  that he may deem it more solemn and binding; and therefore it was that you 
  were asked of what religion you were. We have no other concern with your 
  religious creed." (Morals and Dogma, 11.)
   
  Much more might be cited from 
  Masonic writers authority. But the practice of more than a century the Grand 
  Lodge of England and the principle of the thing require no other support.
   
  The committee would report 
  that the conclusions of the M.W. Grand Master upon the two questions referred 
  are, in his opinion, beyond controversy, being sustained by-long precedent and 
  usage, by the clearest deduction from the fundamental tenets of the 
  Fraternity, and by the concurrent testimony of Masonic scholars. Fraternally 
  submitted, 
   
  EDWIN B. HOLMES,
  ROSCOE POUND,
  LEON M. ABBOTT,
  FREDERIC W. HAMILTON.
  R. PERRY BUSH,
   
  Committee.
   
  Report was accepted and 
  adopted.
   
  ----o----
   
  TRANSCENDENT PATRIOTISM
   
  I am a man, and nothing that 
  concerns human beings is indifferent to me. By nature we are inclined to love 
  mankind; take away this love and you take away all the joy of life, for men 
  are born that they may mutually benefit one another. When one has studied the 
  nature of things and has come to look upon himself as not confined within the 
  walls of one city, or as a member of any particular community, but as a 
  citizen of the Universe considered as a Commonwealth: amid such an 
  acquaintance with Nature and such a grand magnificence of things, to what a 
  Knowledge of himself will he attain ! - Pagan Scriptures.
   
  ----o----
   
  UNPREPAREDNESS
   
  Narrow chested and gray 
  blooded children living in dark rooms in congested tenement districts, eating 
  adulterated food and corrupted in their childhood by an environment of dives, 
  gambling dens and brothels, are a poor foundation for a first line of defense. 
  - Raymond Robins.
   
  ----o----
   
  ADDRESS AT THE INITIATION OF 
  A FOREIGNER
   
  (The following address, found 
  on Page 147, in Part III of the 1798 edition of the Book of Constitutions, 
  prepared for and under authority of the Grand Lodge of Massachusetts by 
  Brother Rev. Thaddeus Mason Harris, Grand Chaplain, rings true in this year 
  1916 as it did at that time. - Editor.)
   
  "You, Brother, the native and 
  subject of another nation, by entering into our Order, have connected 
  yourself, by sacred and affectionate ties, with thousands of Masons in this 
  and other countries. Ever recollect that the Order you have entered into, bids 
  you always to look upon the world as ONE GREAT REPUBLIC, of which every nation 
  is a family, and every particular person a child. When, therefore, you return 
  and settle in your own country, take care that the progress of friendship be 
  not confined to the narrow circle of national connections, or particular 
  religions; but let it be universal, and extend to every branch of the human 
  race. At the same time, remember that, besides the common ties of humanity, 
  you have at this time entered into obligations, which engage you to kind and 
  friendly actions to your Brother Mason, of whatever station countrv or 
  religion."
   
  ----o----
   
  THE HIGHER DEGREE
   
  In the big heart of a true 
  Mason there is no caste, but that which is born of true manhood; no 
  sovereignty but that which willingly begets service; great because lowly, 
  strong because faithful, invincible because patient. - W. F. Kuhn
   
  ----o----
   
  BROTHERHOOD
   
  For years we had stood 
  together
  And toiled at the self-same 
  task,
  With a hand that was worn to 
  leather,
  And the face of an age-old 
  mask.
  Where the narrow walls 
  confined us
  We had dreamed, as a bondsman 
  can,
  Of a world made free for 
  brothers-
  And a kingdom of every man.
  We had dreamed of a space 
  unbounded
  Where the eye sees far and 
  clear,
  With never a thought for 
  nations-
  Ours was a world frontier!
   
  And today it was that I found 
  him
  When we stormed the other 
  trench,
  With a hell-fire hot all 
  round us,
  And a deadlier poisoned 
  stench.
  There he lay, like a wild 
  beast slaughtered,
  And a stain on his mouth like 
  wine,
  And eyes that stared, 
  unseeing,
  To the heaven that's his and 
  mine.
  Perhaps, at to-morrow's 
  dawning.
  I, too, shall be lying there,
  In the only peace and freedom
  That he and I can share.
   
  Elizabeth Berthon Fahnestock, 
  - In "The Outlook."
   
  ----o----
   
  CORRESPONDENCE CIRCLE 
  BULLETIN -- No. 1 Edited by Bro. Robert I. Clegg, Caxton Building, Cleveland, 
  Ohio
   
  NOTE. Of the forty responses 
  to Brother Clegg's "Get Together" Open Letter in the September issue (inside 
  back cover) received up to September 12th, he has selected the following as 
  covering the representative problems presented. The emphasis which he places 
  upon the ability of ONE LIVE MEMBER of the Society to inspire a complete Study 
  Club in his vicinity is well deserved. But let not the individual Brother who 
  desires to be counted "present" in this movement be discouraged, even though 
  others do not join him at once. He will find much of value (and to his liking) 
  in this Department, as time goes on, and the recapitulation of the ways in 
  which problems of organization are being solved, will help him.
   
  The CORRESPONDENCE CIRCLE 
  BULLETIN will for the present be published and distributed with the regular 
  issues of The Builder. This is the most economical method: and, as we believe, 
  will deserve the widest publicity that we can give it. EVERY MEMBER will at 
  once appreciate the increased value of the Society to the Craft, and we hope 
  to show EVERY MEMBER that his interest in Masonry will be best served by 
  allying him self with other interested Brethren for the furtherance of the 
  Society's aims.
   
  THE METHODS WHEREBY STUDIOUS 
  MASONS MAY MINGLE FOR BETTERMENT
   
  THAT article on the inside 
  back cover of the September issue of The Builder must have been timely and 
  truthful. It tapped a fount, yea, a flood of correspondence the end of which 
  is not yet. That the opportunity was ripe there is no question. That there is 
  great good to be accomplished is evident. That we should at once proceed to 
  enter the promised land is beyond dispute. That the work is of the highest 
  importance is unquestioned.
   
  Urgent as is the need of 
  action, it is supremely important that we all be as patient as possible 
  remembering that the undertaking may develop difficulties unforeseen by the 
  wisest. These we will all do our best to iron out as we go along.
   
  Some of the letters telling 
  of real difficulties are most interesting and I hope to give them space in 
  full for general discussion. But as it may not be practical to do this at 
  present I will make extracts from several of them and add such comments as 
  seem most helpful from my point of view. It will be easy to come back to me 
  for additional information if the suggestions I offer are not fully 
  satisfactory, and the printing of the pointers in The Builder will enable 
  others to profit wherever the data is seen to be of benefit, and every reader 
  is also invited to give me and everybody else the advantage of such criticism 
  as may occur to him in the study of this department.
   
  WHEN LOCAL MEMBERS MAY BE FEW
   
  Dear Brother: In re Masonic 
  studies noted on last page last Builder, please furnish me list of local 
  members. Providing there are not sufficient here how may I procure the 
  information ? C.W. Tedrowe, Elk City, Okla
   
  Numbers will make no 
  difference as regards the willingness of the Society to help you. Whether 
  there be two or two hundred members of The National Masonic Research Society 
  that you can reach locally, will not make any difference in that respect. In 
  fact it will be an excellent plan to invite to your meetings Masons who are 
  not already members of the Society. If you get them interested they are very 
  likely to want membership, and as you are not going to invite those you would 
  not care to have join hands with you in this work you thereby enlarge the 
  influence of the Society and make useful additions to your numbers and ours. 
  Tell us what success you have in assembling the brethren. Let us know what 
  subjects seem of the greatest degree of interest to most of you, or what has 
  come up for consideration at your meetings and we will suggest sources of 
  information and lines of investigation that you may take up to profitably 
  employ your time and energies.
   
  LISTS WANTED--SUBJECTS FOR 
  DISCUSSION, MASONIC BOOKS FOR PUBLIC LIBRARY
   
  Dear Brother: Having just 
  read Brother Clegg's letter on the inside cover of the September Builder, I 
  hope to be among the first to respond, as his idea is certainly well worth 
  attention. Our lodge is becoming interested in the history side of Masonry and 
  is planning not only a series of lectures for the coming winter, but a study 
  club of members. While I would appreciate a list of members of the N.M.R.S. in 
  this section, yet am I more interested in a list of subjects for discussion. 
  If I could trouble you for a list of subjects upon which you think a 
  foundation might be built, or which would serve as a nucleus for later 
  original efforts on our part, I would be very appreciative. A list of a few 
  books which our local library has kindly offered to purchase would likewise be 
  appreciated. H. C. Wolf, 408 N. Main St., Edwardsville, Ill.
   
  Let me take the last of your 
  requests first. Your Public Library should have the first volume of The 
  Builder and should subscribe to the subsequent issues. There should also be on 
  file the book on the Philosophy of Masonry by Dean Pound and published by The 
  National Masonic Research Society. The best Encyclopedia is none too good and 
  for this purpose get Mackey's latest edition. Mackey and Singleton's "History 
  of Freemasonry," and R. F. Gould's "Concise History" are also most valuable. 
  We will send you a pamphlet list of Masonic works and shall promptly inform 
  you of the relative merits of any of the items upon which you may desire 
  further light.
   
  A list of subjects for 
  consideration by your brethren and yourself is no easy task to prepare, and 
  then be fully acceptable to you and to me. I am somewhat in the dark as to 
  topics that would appeal to you. For instance I know of a group of Masons that 
  found a very lively interest in digging up all the data obtainable upon such 
  subjects as the Essenes. To me that would have been rather dry but they found 
  it full of zest and charm. Lately I and a few other brothers spent an evening 
  discussing some points in Masonic law and the time slipped away very rapidly 
  but I can imagine there are brethren who would not find that topic at all 
  attractive.
   
  There is to my mind only one 
  way to cut the Gordian knot and that is to do your best to select in the first 
  instance subjects of the greatest general interest and then specialize later 
  when you have the more accurately gauged the tendencies of your own taste and 
  those of your associates.
   
  Suppose we take any one or 
  more of the following points: What is the purpose of Masonry? What is taught 
  by the Entered Apprentice degree ? What is taught by the Fellowcraft degree? 
  What is taught by the Master Mason's degree ? How should a visiting Mason be 
  examined? What ought a member to know of Masonry ? What has been the history 
  of Masonry--tracing the progress of your local lodges, your Grand Lodge and 
  the bodies from whence you drew your authority?
   
  Any one of the above will 
  keep you busy for some time if handled judiciously and thoroughly. Should you 
  like other references please do not fail to write me.
   
  It may also be that you will 
  seek light on some angle of the above that is not clear, and here too every 
  resource we possess is at your service. But start in courageously and keep 
  going.
   
  ANYTHING OF RITUALISTIC OR 
  MONITORIAL MERIT VERY WELCOME
   
  Dear Sir: I note your notices 
  about study clubs, and I would like to do what I can to help you form a club. 
  I am greatly interested in the study of Freemasonry. Could you use an article 
  on the Symbolism of the Third Degree ? Rasmus Bartleson, 452 Dayton Ave., St. 
  Paul, Minn.
   
  The Editor of The Builder is 
  always pleased to receive essays from the brethren. Furthermore it is just 
  such papers as the one you mention that will probably be found highly useful 
  in our study clubs. Already we have had discussions upon Symbolism circulated 
  among lodges when reprinted from The Builder and they were very enjoyable and 
  thought-provoking. Our research into Masonry need not get too far away from 
  what is suggested by the ritual. The "work" is known to all no matter how 
  rusty they may be and the topics based upon it are all the more attractive on 
  that account because all can take part. Right here is the very essence of the 
  scheme; sociable contact in study of the successful sort for classes, the same 
  being based upon the intimate and general appeal of the topics chosen for the 
  attention of the brethren.
   
  VOICES A NEW CRUSADE
   
  Dear Sir and Brother: I read 
  with great interest your very suggestive open letter to members of our Society 
  and am fully in accord with your idea of Masonic study. I think now is the 
  time for all Masons to not only study but also practice in our every day life 
  the duties we owe to the great Institution and to ourselves.
   
  Would it not be a grand 
  uplift to Masonry if every member of every lodge belonged to the Society and 
  then set an evening for study and debate ? There are so many of our members 
  who fail to see the concealed yet revealed beauty of Masonry. C. T. Laschinger, 
  Bonners Ferry, Idaho.
   
  You have indeed hit the nail 
  on the head. May we not also say that the responsibility is ours of increasing 
  the attractiveness of Masonic study? Shall we not all take hold of the 
  situation in our respective localities and endeavor to make others see Masonry 
  as you see it ? How shall we do this ?
   
  I feel confident that we 
  shall later on get from you some serviceable working ideas based on your 
  progress with the brethren. What you say so definitely and well cannot but be 
  followed by action and creditable results. Go forward along the path you have 
  blazed so well, and then let the rest of us have the benefit of your plans and 
  progressiveness.
   
  PLANS VARY WITH PLACES
   
  My dear Brother: In the late 
  issue of The Builder, on the inside back page is a message which I felt was 
  both proper and timely, in all respects.
   
  I desire to be one who asks 
  for the list of brethren in this locality, for the express purpose as 
  mentioned in the article. There are four Blue Lodges in Davis county--at 
  Bloomfield Drakeville, Pulaski, and one which meets at call, at Stiles. The 
  first three are situated in corporate communities, and could well support 
  their individual clubs, although if it is deemed best to start with interested 
  brothers from these places, the best cooperation will be afforded.
   
  If someone from here has 
  already applied, I will gladly cooperate with him in the effort, otherwise I 
  shall use my best endeavors in behalf of the movement, I assure you. John W. 
  Teed, Bloomfield, Iowa.
   
  P. S.--Any suggestion, 
  information, or plans will be gratefully received and appreciated.
   
  Whether you should try for 
  several study clubs or have one is only to be determined by careful 
  examination of the situation from firsthand opportunities. Large classes are 
  unwieldy, small ones don't give the varied points of contact in debate that 
  are afforded by large classes. Small classes are easily called and handled but 
  the absence of one or two members makes a serious hole in the attendance, a 
  large class is the opposite.
   
  My plan would be to get all 
  you can assemble together for a preliminary meeting. Have some well-equipped 
  brother present some subject for consideration. Several others should have 
  prepared themselves to take up the same topic and maintain the interest of the 
  debate. Make the evening lively and useful, entertaining as well as 
  instructive. Let everybody go away with a heart warmed to each of his 
  neighbors in the class. Avoid contention and you will have no corroding 
  resentment.
   
  The simplest parliamentary 
  organization is all that is necessary. You may even change your Chairman every 
  meeting by election from the floor. But you require a good Secretary, some one 
  brother who will make a cherished hobby of the thing.
   
  Where you have several lodges 
  there may be a possibility of having a meeting in each of the locations 
  consecutively. This will depend upon local circumstances, but ought to have a 
  tendency to promote study activities in each place visited. Any way, make a 
  start and the rest will take care of itself as you go along.
   
  Be sure to keep us posted on 
  your progress. Every one of these organizations for study will have problems 
  that in their solution will benefit other like bodies. Therefore let all hands 
  make a practice of telling us of the details of their progress, what obstacles 
  are met and how they are overcome, what has tended to harmony and what has 
  not, what has been most edifying and what hasn't. Don't keep your troubles and 
  your triumphs to yourself. Remember the time when successful and unsuccessful 
  reports wound up in a triumphal procession for everybody. So tell us of all 
  your doings.
   
  THE FELLOWCRAFT DEGREE
   
  Dear Sir and Brother: I have 
  just read your open letter to members in the last number of The Builder.
   
  The Fifth Saturday Research 
  Work of City of the Straits Lodge No. 452 will take up the study of the 
  Fellowcraft Degree at its next meeting and I would like very much to have not 
  only a list of your Detroit members but the use of any articles and papers you 
  may have dealing particularly with that branch of Masonry.
   
  Our Research meetings are 
  made compulsory by Lodge Bylaws and are meeting with much success, interest 
  and contributions by members being general and attendance excellent.
   
  We are indebted to The 
  Builder for much advice and assistance.--F. A. Hilton, Chairman of Committee, 
  Detroit, Mich.
   
  A copy of the "Symbolism of 
  the Fellowcraft Degree" has been sent to you and I daresay you found it of 
  much interest and usefulness. I expect you also read in this connection the 
  chapter on Preston in Dean Pound's "Philosophy of Masonry." The latter gives 
  you a key to the meaning of Fellowcraft Masonry as it looks to me. But if I 
  start in here to expound what in my humble judgment are the fundamentals of 
  Masonic teaching I fear I shall take up too much space and I may get tedious 
  at that !
   
  Your report shows several 
  exceedingly noteworthy points. First of all your Lodge in its wisdom has set 
  an admirable example. Would that all Lodges were equally alert, and informed.
   
  Please let us know the titles 
  of the papers read by your members. Kindly advise us of the relative interest 
  of the several subjects. How were the papers discussed and to what extent? As 
  you will see from these answering notes of mine in this department there is a 
  constant desire of my correspondents to know what to study. There is so much 
  that can be studied that I must not overtax the efforts of the brethren by any 
  long lists of topics. Now if I can from the experience of others add to my own 
  conclusions I am not only the more nearly right but I shall feel much better 
  satisfied that everybody w ill derive good and wholesome instruction.
   
  ALREADY AT WORK
   
  Dear Sir and Brother: Some of 
  us have been trying to conduct something of a study club in our lodge here in 
  the past year. Any information that will be of he]p to us as suggested by Bro. 
  Robert I. Clegg in his letter to members on the last page of the last issue of 
  The Builder will be greatly appreciated. L. F. Knowles, Mantorville, Minn.
   
   Dear Sir: I have read with 
  much interest the open letter to members by Brother Robert I. Clegg and as the 
  suggestion is directly in line with some ideas that I have already tried to 
  start among the brothers, I would be pleased to receive a list of the members 
  of the Society in Chicago and will do whatever I can to further the work. W. 
  F. Reinbold, 212 W. Washington St., Chicago. P. S.--Any suggestions as to 
  subjects, programs, etc., will, of course, be gratefully received.
   
  Dear Brother: Just received 
  the September Builder. I have for some time been dreaming of the plan 
  suggested for study clubs by Brother Clegg. The only reason I haven't tried it 
  has been the lack of time to work out programs. Your suggestions solve the 
  difficulty. Count me in for starting one here. If anyone else has preceded me, 
  let me know so I can help him out. Yours fraternally, Ralph B. Smith, Keokuk, 
  Iowa.
   
  Each of you has already 
  thought over your local prospects and your problems are similar. I can 
  therefore group what I have to say.
   
  It is particularly gratifying 
  to me that I happened to voice what has proved to be in the minds of so many 
  of the brethren. They have doubtless cogitated over angles of the problem that 
  have eluded me. As time goes on I expect to get in touch with some of this 
  individual research and to profit by it. Let not any of us withhold whatever 
  it is that will help the cause forward.
   
   Another very pleasing aspect 
  of our progress so far in this work is the readiness of brethren not only to 
  start something but if they have happened not to be pioneers in the race they 
  are equally willing and ready to play second fiddle and to support their 
  leader heartily and vigorously. That is the feeling that wins. That is the 
  true spirit of Masonry.
   
  But of you three brethren and 
  ail the others of your calibre wherever they may be dispersed, to use the 
  time-honored phrase, I beg of you to read carefully what is here said in The 
  Builder of this date relative to organization and of matters for study and 
  investigation.
   
  How far my suggestions fit 
  your problems it is of course impossible for me to say. If they fail to meet 
  your wants, (and tentative as they are it is almost certain that they will 
  come short and be found wanting in some respect for your purpose), I can only 
  welcome your confidence and pledge you my best cooperation wherever and 
  whenever what is known to me may serve you.
   
  The main thing is to make a 
  start. Get a few brethren together. See that they are congenial. Stage a 
  discussion in which they can all take an active part. Make each member present 
  a missionary. Increase your numbers slowly. Encourage your brethren to submit 
  questions. A Question Box is a good thing, especially if you have some one to 
  follow it up. Invite questions to be presented at the meetings and also sent 
  to the Secretary between meetings. Assign these questions to well informed 
  brethren. Taboo all half-baked replies. Make the answer stand on its feet 
  firmly. Distinguish between speculation and knowledge. Set asunder fiction and 
  fact. Ask for evidence. These and similar expedients conducted courteously and 
  with fervor should hold combined interest and enlarge and make fruitful your 
  gatherings. Try them out.
   
  OFFICIAL ACTION ON MASONIC 
  STUDY: WHAT SHALL BE DONE, AND HOW?
   
  What could be done by our 
  Grand Lodge to promote the study side of Masonry? Your opinion and suggestions 
  are invited upon our making the right start. Your article on "How to Study 
  Masonry," in The Builder, impressed me so favorably that I venture to intrude 
  upon your time and patience. Anything we do will probably be on a small scale 
  to start, but I believe if we are able to make the start right we will 
  eventually accomplish results. S. H. S.
   
  You as Chairman of your Grand 
  Lodge Committee honor me by what you ask. Nothing would please me more than to 
  say something capable of being adopted by your Grand Lodge.
   
  My thought in what I wrote 
  for The Builder was to suggest some easy plan whereby a start could be made 
  without of necessity requiring any Grand Lodge authority or encouragement. 
  Your suggestion therefore carries my plan much further afield than was at the 
  time contemplated by me. Please have patience with me if on that account I may 
  offer an idea or two that seem amateurish or immature.
   
  1. Have your Grand Lodge 
  appoint a Committee on Masonic Education. Have this Committee submit a 
  comprehensive report every year to the Grand Lodge on (a) The general progress 
  of Masonic Research; (b) Masonic study in your state; (c) a summary of what 
  has been done by individual lodges toward the Masonic improvement of their 
  members, and what has been done by any individual members to promote Masonic 
  Research. (d) submit a list of Masonic lecturers and lectures presented during 
  the year to your lodges, and also maintain a list of available addresses of 
  value that may be obtained by your lodges. You can readily extend this list of 
  things that such a Committee ought to do.
   
  2. Whenever you hold a School 
  of Instruction let the above Committee present someone to give an able 
  address. Not a weak mushy frothy flow of verbiage but a paper of scholarly 
  brand. Don't let the speaker extemporize. Make him dig. Edit the paper 
  carefully in advance. You have the men who can do this and do it right. Draw 
  on them. Make the paper the climax of your work of instruction and do not 
  permit it to be shelved or curtailed when you have decided what it shall be.
   
  3. Have your Grand Lodge join 
  with the Grand Lodge of Iowa in what is known as the Clipping Service. Write 
  to the Grand Secretary, Brother N. R. Parvin, at Cedar Rapids, for his 
  descriptive circular. Maybe you won't care to join with them notwithstanding 
  the economy. Your independence pleases me. Go it alone.
   
  Furthermore, have your 
  Committee prepare two or three good addresses. Print them on plain, unglazed 
  paper in large type, ten point or even larger for easy reading. Advise your 
  Lodges of the papers you have on hand. Urge them to try these on the brethren. 
  Have them read at a time when they will get proper attention. Get the 
  Worshipful Master to inform the Committee over his signature and that of the 
  Secretary of the Lodge what was done in every case to insure a good 
  attendance, whether there was any discussion, and how long it lasted, and what 
  was the effect of the paper, etc.
   
  Of course I could easily 
  write a lot of these things and at that I might easily miss the very things on 
  which you particularly require my views. The only remedy is to ask me again. 
  Two cents will reach me. Don't hesitate to call on me for anything I can tell 
  you.
   
  Don't forget that the 
  National Masonic Research Society has a store of pamphlets and circulars of 
  most interesting Masonic material.
   
  But why wait for Grand Lodge 
  action ? Try out this scheme of The Builder in your own Lodge. Read once more 
  what you have already gone through on the East end of the September issue. 
  Find out what suits your Lodge. Ten to one that will give you a fair lead on 
  all the other Lodges. Then go into your Grand Lodge prayerfully. Get a 
  Committee appointed that has an interest in the study side of Masonry. Pick 
  men of influence to give your Committee weight, men of brains to make its 
  views respected, active men to accomplish results, men potent, apt and 
  tactful. But don't expect too much of anybody except yourself. May all good 
  luck attend you.
   
  R. I. CLEGG.
   
  OUR ORGANIZATION--FUNCTIONAL 
  AND ORGANIC
   
  A batch of letters had been 
  answered to the best of my ability. I was catching up with the aftermath of 
  that article of mine on the cover of the September Builder when lo there 
  arrived, hot from the wire, a telegram from far-off Texas asking for a course 
  of study to be outlined. Already the subject has been touched upon in a 
  discussion scheduled for appearance in the October Builder. For the present 
  that may serve. Meantime the matter will get careful consideration in such 
  time as I can divert from the prosaic but necessary labors of business. Let 
  not any of Our readers imagine for a moment that their inquiries and 
  suggestions do not in every case receive prompt attention. But many of them 
  are not adapted to offhand decision. Time and plenty of it is usually wanted 
  and employed before these matters may receive their just due.
   
  This brings me naturally to 
  weighing our facilities for handling the correspondence that is coming our 
  way. This flood of ideas, these requests for guidance, this presentation of 
  cases in more or less detail for diagnosis, impress upon the mind of the 
  receiver a sense of keen responsibility. In some way or another we must bring 
  to bear upon these problems all the critical and constructive energies of 
  theoretical and practical Masonry, certainly a much greater resource than any 
  one Mason or group of Masons has at command.
   
  Publication of letters from 
  our members will constitute a valuable forum for the general discussion of 
  aims and ends, methods and means. Already this promises to be an enlivening 
  and most instructive department. To this section there will be freely added 
  editorial comments based upon our constantly increasing sources of information 
  at home and abroad.
   
  But we must get beyond the 
  forum stage. While it is an excellent thing in itself, and by all processes 
  and in every particular to be vigorously encouraged, yet the Society ought not 
  to halt content with that degree of progress. We need methodical plans, 
  unified and finished. Speaking as an engineer I may say the whole proposition 
  just aches for a layout and a blueprint of it prepared for every Mason.
   
  Unfortunately a complete 
  design precedes the working layout and the blueprints. We shall get the design 
  into useful and generally acceptable shape when we have first compiled and 
  digested all the attendant conditions. Having determined all the angles of the 
  problem we can with the greater confidence seek a satisfactory solution.
   
  Here at this point is the 
  keynote of our project. Much of the preliminary work with study classes must 
  be experimental. Let us be informed by our readers as to what is everywhere 
  done and how it worked. Nothing is more important. Now, in the formative 
  period, we need just that sort of information. We cannot have too much of it 
  nor in too detailed a form.
   
  This matter of method applies 
  not only to the manner of conducting meetings, the assembling of members, the 
  generation of enthusiasm, the setting of the brethren to work individually and 
  collectively, but it must treat of textbooks, their respective merits and the 
  most efficient methods of using them. The latter is a slow task. A start has 
  been made but much remains to do.
   
  To set the Craft to work and 
  give them wholesome instruction is the purpose of the National Masonic 
  Research Society. That instruction will be the more effective when based upon 
  the largest possible experience of the Craft. Therefore put the study plan to 
  the test. Report the results. From these facts may lay a foundation for the 
  future greatly improving our work of the past. Let us all take hold and at 
  least lift our share of the burden wherever we may be.
   
  A COURSE IN THE STUDY OF 
  MASONRY
   
  (A few emergency hints to 
  meet an urgent demand)
   
  Masonry may be divided into 
  five departments for study-- Ritual, History, Philosophy, Symbolism, Law.
   
  1. Ritual may be discussed in 
  its relations to the Old Charges, folklore, mystery plays of the middle ages, 
  survivals of tribal ceremonials, building customs, monitorial divergences and 
  development, etc.
   
  2. History may be examined as 
  of any Lodge (where for instance all members of a study class belong to one 
  lodge); and Grand Lodge, and their original source of authority. Local and 
  State historical records are valuable sources of information with Mackey's 
  History, Gould's Concise History, etc.
   
  3. Philosophy may be studied 
  with the aid of Dean Pound's book, an N.M.R.S. publication.
   
  4. Symbolism. The symbols of 
  Masonry are all treated freely in Mackey's Encyclopedia.
   
  5. Law. The Masonic Code of 
  one's own State has leading place of course. Then there is the indispensable 
  Encyclopedia, and Mackey also has a book on Masonic Jurisprudence.
   
  Get your local library to 
  furnish a list of references to Masonic topics it possesses. Many are often 
  obtained in that way. Assign the several foregoing subdivisions to as many 
  brethren and give to each the references bearing upon his chosen alloted 
  topic.
   
  Every one should have his own 
  library of Masonic works. Few as the books may be, they are at hand for 
  convenient and frequent reference. A good, compact, general textbook, limited 
  but of fine quality, is "The Builders" by Bro. Newton and obtainable through 
  the N. M. R. S. R. I. CLEGG.
   
  THE SOCIETY'S PUBLICATIONS
   
  (Owing to the increased cost 
  of printing and binding, it has become necessary for us to make a slight 
  advance in the price of bound volumes, as stated below. The Society some time 
  ago put out a catalog of various books, and the unsold copies in that catalog 
  remain unchanged in price.) 
   
  Books.
   
  THE BUILDERS, A Story and 
  Study of Masonry
  Price. ....$1.50
  By Joseph Fort Newton.
   
  THE BUILDER, Volume 1, 
  (Goldenrod Buckram),
  8 vo. ...3.00
   
  THE BUILDER, Volume 1, (3/4 
  Morocco) ..........4.00
   
  THE BUILDER, Volume 2, (Out 
  in December),
  (Buckram)...3.00
   
  THE BUILDER, Volume 2, (3/4, 
  Morocco) ....4.00
   
  THE PHILOSOPHY OF MASONRY, 
  (Blue Cloth, 16mo)...1.00
  By Roscoe Pound, Harvard 
  University.
   
  Pamphlets.
   
  DEEPER ASPECTS OF MASONIC 
  SYMBOLISM,
  (Paper covers)...By A. E. 
  Waite, England. $ .15
   
  THE FIRST DEGREE........  .15
  By A. W. Gage, Illinois.
   
  THE THIRD DEGREE........   
  .15
  By J. Otis Ball, Illinois.
   
  QUESTIONS ON "THE BUILDERS" 
  (By Joseph Fort Newton) ... .25
  Compiled by the Cincinnati 
  Masonic Study School. 
   
  THE STORY OF OLD GLORY, THE 
  OLDEST FLAG ..  .50
   
  (With Flag Color Plate.) By 
  John W. Barry, Iowa.
   
  (All above prices include 
  postage)
  SPECIAL PRICES ON PAMPHLETS 
  IN LOTS OF 100
  OR MORE.
   
  ----o----
   
  TRAVEL SKETCHS
   
  BY JOSEPH FORT NEWTON
   
  ON THE SEA
   
  Prompt to the minute, on June 
  17, at noon, the Philadelphia moved from her pier and slowly turned to the 
  open sea. The orchestra was playing, the decks were crowded, and perhaps a 
  thousand people were waving farewells--among them a good Brother Mason who was 
  kind enough to come and bid me good bye. It was a scene not soon to be 
  forgotten. Surely, there is something infinite in every parting, and never 
  more so than when the Sea is to separate us. Soon individual faces faded and 
  we could only see the handkerchiefs fluttering signals of 
  goodwill--handkerchiefs wet with tears.
   
  New York, seen from the 
  harbor, is a great picture indeed, albeit made less vivid by a haze of smoke 
  and fog that hung over it. Suddenly the sun broke through the mist, and it 
  seemed like a fairy city seen in a dream --a land of fairy cliff-dwellers ! No 
  wonder Poole wrote his story of The Harbor and the romance of it. But the 
  picture does not remain long, save in memory where our pictures hang. Dimmer 
  and dimmer it grows, until at last it is a blur, and then a thin blue line, 
  and finally it fades. No one may put into words his feelings at such an hour, 
  when for the first time he leaves his native land and turns to the great open 
  sea !
   
  And the Sea! For an inlander 
  like myself, it is a thing of wonder, at once a fact and a figure, a symbol 
  and a parable. Like sky, like sea. If the sky is gray, so is the sea. If blue, 
  the sea is blue--such a dark, rich blue. But it was very gray when we set 
  sail. Soon a fog fell over us and we could hardly see the boat that met us to 
  take our pilot off. And that fog-horn is terrifying ! What would life be if 
  all our dangers made that much noise. Perhaps they do, only we do not hear the 
  warnings.
   
  But the fog soon lifted, like 
  a curtain, and revealed the Sea ' The Sea ! the Sea ! so wide and grand, 
  stretching away into infinity--yea, "The Sea is His, and He made it." All day 
  long the great words of the Bible about the Sea kept coming to mind, with new 
  meanings I had never guessed before. Truly that old Book is like a harp which 
  says for us what our poor, dumb words cannot say. "There is sorrow upon the 
  sea; it cannot be still," what words they are as one looks out over those 
  restless, reinless waters. And there came also those other words, so freighted 
  with meaning just now, "and the sea gave up the dead that were in it." But 
  best of all the line of the Psalmist, "Thy way, O Lord, is in the sea."
   
  Really, if I were a rich 
  Pagan instead of a poor Mason, I would build a temple to the Sea. It is so 
  strong and deep, so patient, merciful, and gracious, to ship or soul that 
  bravely casts loose upon its mighty promises; so variable and cruel to the 
  unpiloted and unseaworthy. It is a great burden-bearer. It cannot be 
  overloaded. It cannot be broken down. It never grows weary. It never needs 
  repairs. Also, it is a great physician. It rests the eye with its overpowering 
  vastness of outlook. It calms the heart with its greatness and its 
  never-ending music. It speaks to the mind of that Divine abyss over which the 
  mystics brood but never fathom. It responds to every mood--now sad, now glad, 
  now quietly meditative; it answers every call of the imagination, and can 
  preach more sermons than all preachers. Besides, it is a great teacher. It 
  lays its mighty law upon the restless spirit and tells us to stop sputtering-- 
  be still, listen, and know. And as we listen, the sighs of human care are lost 
  in the murmur of its many waters. At last Restlessness, cut off from its 
  supplies, surrenders to Rest.
   
  Why did St. John leave the 
  Sea out of his vision of heaven ? He foresaw a time when "there shall be no 
  more sea." Why so? No doubt the exile on the Isle of Patmos, longing for the 
  fair city of Ephesus, the scene of his ministry, and hungering for the sight 
  of familiar faces, grew weary of the imprisoning sea. Sundered by leagues of 
  tumbling waves from those he loved, he dreamed of a world where there would be 
  "no sea." But it is not so now--not so much so at least. Once the symbol of 
  separation, the sea has become a bond of union between lands and peoples. Once 
  the dread of daring sailors, who, despite their dread, braved its dangers and 
  discovered its paths, it has become the servant of man, yielding to the quiet 
  power of intelligence. The sea of which Homer and Virgil sing is the unknown, 
  untamed sea. We today sail a sea whose ways, waves and winds are an open book, 
  and whose forces have been converted into beneficent ministries.
   
  Still, Matthew Arnold speaks 
  of "unplumbed, salt, estranging sea," by which he meant the awful isolation of 
  each soul in an unfathomable universe. More often in English poetry--and 
  indeed in all poetry, since Homer, that has in it the sound of the sea--the 
  tidal rhythms of the sea, its measured waves and its immeasurable horizons, 
  have been the great symbols of the Divine depth and mystery; just as the stars 
  round off the three divisions of the Divine Comedy of Dante. The music of this 
  deeper and more eternal sea rolls through all great poetry, and nowhere with 
  more melody than in Shakespeare, who caught the very cadence of that 
  unfathomable sea whose waves are years and whose depth is eternity.
   
  How can a man be irreligious 
  on the Sea? Are we not, all of us, now and forever, out on the bosom of the 
  deep, with the infinite above, beneath, and about us? We feel secure enough 
  indeed, thanks largely to the cheerful company, the dear faces, the duties and 
  pieties of the day. Still, when at times we look over the edge of the boat, up 
  starts a primitive terror which only faith can allay. Religion is a thing of 
  the depths and for the depths. "Have mercy upon me, O Lord, my boat is so 
  small, and Thine ocean is so great,"--in that cry of the old Breton fisherman 
  we have the profound instinct which lies at the heart of faith. Reason may 
  serve us in shallow waters, but when life takes us beyond our depth, as it so 
  often does, faith saves us. There will be companies of believing souls, so 
  long as there are deep, unplumbed places in this life of ours.
   
  But here I am a-preaching, as 
  usual--from force of habit, no doubt. Yet there are worse things one could be 
  guilty of. Moreover, I cannot help it. Last night I sat up on the upper deck 
  of the ship near the prow, at midnight, long after others had gone to bed - 
  except, of course, the guzzlers in the saloon. It was a clear cool night of 
  stars, and the great sea lay spread out beneath. It was a still and holy hour 
  in which the sea and the stars told me many things. Never did the great old 
  words, "What is man, that Thou art mindful of him ?" come home with such awful 
  majesty of simple truth to subdue the heart and still it. And yet, never did I 
  have a more vivid sense of the greatness and worth of the soul as in that 
  solemn trysting time. Then the ship bell rang out the hour, the watchman above 
  cried, "All's Well," and I went to my couch knowing that if I sank it would be 
  not into the sea, but beyond it !
   
  Thus and so our good ship of 
  Brotherly Love sails on and on, out over the blue rim of the world. Again and 
  again one turns away from the Human Comedy on board to the mighty Sea whose 
  lonely waters drift and sing! How indifferent it is to our human doings and 
  undoings, how deaf to our jabbering gossip, its white caps suggesting shining 
  teeth showing in laughter at our vanities. It knows nothing of the greatness 
  of Kitchener, and buries him as quickly as it does the poor stoker dropped 
  into a vast and wandering grave. Merciful when we obey her, merciless when we 
  disobey, she lulls us to sleep at night as if the ship were a cradle rocked by 
  an unseen hand. I have fallen in love with the Sea. As long as I live its 
  mighty waters will whisper to my heart of "that immortal sea which brought us 
  hither," and will receive us to its bosom "when that which drew from out the 
  boundless deep, turns again home." Whatever betide, it is enough to know that
   
  "There is a wideness in God's 
  mercy, 
  Like the wideness of the 
  Sea." At Sea, June 22. 
   
  ----o----
   
  THE EMPIRE OF FREEMASONRY
   
  BY BRO. J. GEORGE GIBSON, 
  ENGLAND
   
  An Empire implies an 
  Imperator; and it is evident that Freemasonry cannot be imperial even with the 
  limitation of the widest and most free of all the Empires of the political 
  world at its head. There was a time when we should have thought that Older 
  which comprised among its membership representatives from every one of our 
  British colonies must be sufficiently broad to satisfy all the demands of the 
  imperial state. That time has long gone by. Freemasonry is no longer willing, 
  or able, to accept the tutelage of even the greatest profane Empire, and 
  cannot accept either the limitation which that tutelage implies. The Craft has 
  discovered that it exists not on sufferance as an adjunct of social 
  amelioration, but that it is as ancient as the oldest form of government, and 
  has at least an equal empire with that of the mightiest of worldly political 
  systems. The researches of the savants of Masonry, and the dreams of the more 
  imaginative, have done a great deal to make it impossible for us to begin our 
  history in the 17th or 18th centuries. We can no longer find the warrant for 
  our landmark in the determination of the four London Lodes, or in the older 
  custom and law of the older operative lodges. There may be a difference of 
  opinion as he antiquity of the earth, and of the Masonic cult of ancient days; 
  but it is evident to the most casual student that our authority is antecedent 
  to even the erection of the pyramids of Egypt and elsewhere, and that we must 
  base our imperial structure right back upon the foundations that are of most 
  ancient readings of the Book of the Sacred Law. But whether we accept the 
  theory of the experts of Masonic literature as to the Egyptian origin of human 
  civilization, or date our authority from the comparatively recent Grand Lodges 
  of Sinai and Jerusalem, in either case we find our prime authority in the 
  command of the Creator, which moved holy men in divers ways, and at divers 
  times to fix in labour the determination of the Divine. And every conception 
  of the Masonic Empire must assume the Authority of the G. A. O. T. U., without 
  which neither Masonry nor Empire can exist.
   
  There have been of recent 
  years many evident signs of a desire on the part of mankind, including both 
  true Masons and those who are under the impression that they can be true 
  Masons without recognizing the Supremacy of the Creator, to come nearer 
  together in labour and in the manifestation of Masonic Brotherhood. With many 
  of these overtures we are to some extent in sympathy, though not as Masons. We 
  recognize and admire much that has been done, or attempted. by those even who 
  are not in sympathy with our aims, and our position respecting the place in 
  the Lodge of the symbol of the Divine throne. And nothing would please us more 
  than to have the power and the authority to give the grip of fellowship to 
  those in whose testimony against iniquity and slavery we have felt the keenest 
  delight. We have even been at times tempted to wonder whether we have not been 
  just a little too hasty in our assumption that the symbols are necessary to 
  the recognition of the authority they represent. We have been at times also 
  agreeably surprised to find the members of these quasi-masonic bodies (as some 
  regard them) acting very much as we would act in similar circumstances. And 
  yet we have always come to see that any derogation from the sole authority of 
  the Creator means the inevitable sequel of the setting up of a host of 
  denominational authorities which each claims to exercise rule upon the great 
  Level, and each renders anything like harmonious labour a something out of the 
  question. We are more and more convinced that the only possible Empire is that 
  which has supreme as its warrant the Imperator. We need not go abroad to see 
  this. We have many institutions of a beautiful and useful character, such as 
  the Christian orders of chivalry to which so many Masons delight to belong. 
  Introduce the ritual and the legend of one of these into the lodge of Craft 
  Masonry, and disruption is certain. And when we remember that there are so 
  many of the religions of the world that do not accord to that we most of us 
  belong to that respect that we render to it, we can see at once that the 
  imperial Masonry must, and can alone come, upon the basis of true Craft and 
  Royal Arch Masonry.
   
  Nor can this Empire come 
  under the aegis of any nation, or race. Religions have shown that their 
  influence is greatest when they do not follow the flag. A flag not our own 
  excites suspicion of dynastic aims and that religion is the most successful in 
  establishing itself which is not identified with any nation, but only with the 
  Imperator in whose name the missionary goes forth. The authority must become 
  effective through the human and not the national instrumentality.
   
  Mankind is more than Nations 
  are,  And human trust than nation's power.
   
  Cordial intents have not been 
  born through the skill of the diplomat; but have become effective through the 
  pervasive friendship of peoples, which diplomats have recognized and made use 
  of. And the empire of Freemasonry must come by a similar pervasion. We do not 
  attack the religions that recognize the authority of the LORD of the Sacred 
  Name; but we pervade them with the spirit which finds access to every one of 
  them. It is this spirit which creates the empire. There are religions which as 
  such have little in common and yet which in the lodge find that all are aiming 
  at the correct building of the temple, and all are depending upon the accuracy 
  of the same plans. Where we cannot meet in comfort in church, we can delight 
  in gathering at the Pool of Siloam. We cannot unite in the propagation of a 
  doctrine of religion; but we meet upon the square in all the work of education 
  and nation building that we
   
  devote our common labour to 
  as Freemasons. The place for flag waving is not the lodge; for there we 
  realize as perhaps nowhere else that the Masonic Empire must be the goal of a 
  perfect national ideal, and that all nations, whether they know it or not are 
  working toward the ideal of a common brotherhood. And we feel assured that 
  there is no common brotherhood without its anterior Common Fatherhood. Already 
  Freemasonry has made war less terrible, and less in evidence as the final 
  arbiter of nations. Already things are of common occurrence in the campaign 
  which testify that the world is coming to the view that in the builder's Lodge 
  there are things of greater importance than the dialect of the Mason or the 
  garments he wears. The babel of tongues no longer shuts out from the universal 
  communion any of the sons of God. As we are told the first wandering of 
  Mankind began with Man's disobedience to the Supreme Law, so the return of Man 
  to his proper Oneness will come about when the obedience is restored.
   
  Yet, while we must place the 
  flag in its proper relationship to Masonry, we cannot but be pleased that 
  there is such a tendency among those who do speak our language and are filled 
  with our spirit to a closer reunion within the bounds of the world Empire of 
  our race. The Masonic leaven must begin to work in the homes of those who were 
  once of our own household. And Freemasonry can only become imperial by this 
  leavening process. Already the old suspicions and animosities which had much 
  of their origin in political feuds centuries ago are dying a natural death. 
  There is expressed on both sides of the Atlantic a feeling that it is about 
  time that our common Anglo-Saxon conception of Masonry should be presented in 
  more similar forms. Now that there is no reason for the suspicion that 
  territorial considerations are at the base of the desire for unanimity some 
  round table conference might be sought without invidious suggestion; and this 
  would pave the way to many acts of community that would eventuate in a better 
  understanding, and a more intelligent appreciation of each other's Masonic 
  ideals. And a common ideal held by those who hail from the North of Europe, 
  would not be allowed to end there. At present there is a sharp line of 
  cleavage which insensibly divides the Latin from the other races of European 
  descent. There is no reason why this should continue to exist, and the common 
  understanding of the Masons, and the Masonic bodies that are represented in 
  our American Colonies and the great Republic beyond the Atlantic would prepare 
  the way to such a rapprochement as might result in a world Masonry that would 
  be in deed and in truth a real Empire.
   
  Without for a moment abating 
  one demand of pure Masonry, and indeed with a common accentuation of that upon 
  which Masonry is based, it might be found possible to replace the travesty of 
  Masonry so much in evidence in the South with the real thing. And could this 
  be done then we should indeed be impregnable as an army of Peace, and of 
  Progress. Later the ancient, but less known systems of the yellow and red 
  races might have attention, with the effect that the separating suspicions 
  which are so hindering in their influence upon the advance of the race would 
  prove easier of solution. There is no field in which the beneficent influence 
  of Freemasonry might find itself barred. All that is disruptive in the present 
  social system, all that is wasteful in the present method of government, all 
  that is generative of suspicion or hatred in the councils of men, and all that 
  in any way would, or could, tend to hold back mankind from the common labour 
  which would build the temple of Humanity, would prove still more easy to get 
  rid of, and Man would be elevated to more than his pristine purity and 
  usefulness. The imperial ideal of Freemasonry has robbed the "wireless" of 
  much of its terrors; and the "airship bogie" would lose half its dangers did 
  we realize in the language of a common Masonic experience how much better it 
  is for brethren to dwell together in unity, in an Empire of Brotherhood.
   
  ----o---- 
   
  THE BUILDER OCTOBER 1916
   
  BY BRO. M.S. HUGHES, 
  CALIFORNIA
   
  Ye editor does not have time 
  to read the Proceedings of all the Grand Lodges, but he wishes to call 
  attention from time to time to matters in such as he does read. For example, 
  the report of the Committee on Masonic Education in the Proceedings of the 
  Grand Lodge of California--with which this Society had somewhat to do, by way 
  of suggestion--is worthy of study. Furthermore, we wish to express 
  appreciation of the brilliant address on "A Triad of Masonic Ideals," by the 
  Grand Orator, Brother M. S. Hughes. It is thoughtful, finely phrased, and 
  straight to the point, as well as rich in striking epigrams. He discusses the 
  ideals of Quality, of Knowledge, of Religion, and where there is so much that 
  is good it is not easy to select. We content ourselves, for the present at 
  least, with that part of the address touching upon the necessity of Masonic 
  education, which is not only pertinent to the purposes of this Society, but 
  interesting as disclosing the attitude of the leaders of the Craft in the 
  Grand Jurisdiction of California.)
   
  Our second Masonic ideal is 
  that of knowledge. One of the ends of Masonry is light; and light is 
  synonymous with intelligence. The man who travels the highway from West to the 
  East is a seeker after light. The implication is that Masonry has an 
  educational function, and that every Lodge ought to be a school of instruction 
  with a curriculum covering the theory and practice of brotherhood. This 
  educational function of Masonry ought to have in view both the individual 
  member and the world at large.
   
  It is a necessity if we are 
  to have a Masonically intelligent membership. It goes without saying that no 
  man ever grasped the full significance of the principles Masonry simply by 
  receiving the degrees. In the first place, a great deal of our ritual work has 
  come to us from the past. Much of it, therefore, needs translation because of 
  terms that are obsolete, and interpretation because of forms that are archaic. 
  In the next place, there is much that is symbolical; and symbols, such as 
  those employed by Masonry, need more than the passing explanation given in two 
  or three brief lectures. Again, the circumstances under which the degrees are 
  received are not conducive to clearness and continuity of thought. And, 
  finally, many Lodges are all too lax in conferring degrees without even the 
  superficial preparation required by Masonic usage. These are some of the 
  reasons why every Lodge should be a school of instruction on the subject of 
  Masonic spirit and methods.
   
  The results of our failure in 
  this respect are manifest. The first outcome is what may be called Masonic 
  illiteracy. It is not too much to say that there are a great many who have 
  received our degrees who have no clear idea as to what a Mason actually is. If 
  they were held up at the point of a gun some night with the demand: "A 
  definition of a Mason, or your life!" they would be likely to turn up in 
  heaven or some other place at breakfast time. The current notions about our 
  Order sometimes remind one of the famous college definition of a lobster. A 
  freshman was asked by the professor of natural history to define a lobster. He 
  gravely replied that a lobster is a red fish that walks backward. The 
  professor said it was a most excellent definition with some trifling 
  exceptions. In the first place, a lobster is not a fish; in the second place, 
  it is not red; and, in the third place, it does not walk backward. Otherwise, 
  he said, the freshman had given a good definition.
   
  Now, Masonry either stands 
  for something definite, or it does not. If it does mean anything definite and 
  distinctive, then every member of a Lodge should have clear ideas on the 
  subject. That desirable end can only be accomplished by making every Lodge a 
  school of instruction, and having intelligence, as one of our Masonic ideals, 
  kept constantly in view. Even our fundamental principles need interpretation. 
  It is a commonplace, for example, to say that Masonry means brotherhood. But 
  at once a score of questions are suggested to the inquisitive mind: What kind 
  of brotherhood? What is brotherhood? What does Masonic brotherhood imply? What 
  are the obligations of Masonic brotherhood under specific circumstances? What 
  is the relation of the brotherhood to those who do not belong? The intelligent 
  Mason ought, at the very least, to be able to give answers to such elementary 
  questions.
   
  When we remember that the man 
  who comes into Masonry takes up a life work, the necessity for the educational 
  function of the Masonic Lodge appears even more imperative. Brotherhood is a 
  profession, comprising both a science and an art; but who acquires a 
  profession in the conferring of three degrees on three evenings, together with 
  the memorizing of a few paragraphs of a ritual service, and the hearing of a 
  few brief lectures? The man who takes up the profession of medicine these days 
  must have a preparatory college course; must prosecute four years of strenuous 
  study; must serve his time in hospital; and after all that it is considered 
  that he is just ready to begin practice. The same thing is true of the other 
  learned professions. But we expect to turn out qualified Masons after the 
  manner of some of our get-rich-quick advertisements. The impossibility of such 
  a thing is self-evident; the imperative demand for the persistent diffusion of 
  Masonic intelligence among the members of the craft is no less apparent.
   
  It is also to be emphasized 
  that Freemasonry owes something in the way of the spreading of its principles 
  to the world at large. Our teachings are not to be kept in cotton-wool, only 
  to be brought out and exhibited within the secrecy of the lodge-room. There 
  are certain things for which Masonry stands and there are certain things 
  against which Masonry stands, and those things may well be known to mankind, 
  both for the sake of Masonry and for the sake of the world. My earliest 
  Masonic recollection goes back to the time when I was a little boy. There was 
  a man in the small community accused of stealing turkeys. He was brought up 
  for trial in a Masonic Lodge, found guilty and expelled. The action of the 
  Lodge became known to the public, and the community understood that, whatever 
  else the Order favored or opposed, it was against turkey stealing. That is the 
  first thing I remember about the Masonic Order; and now that I have had a 
  rather extensive and comprehensive acquaintance, it is my conviction that it 
  was a very wholesome beginning.
   
  We believe that our 
  principles are of value to mankind, and that each fraternity is a prophecy of 
  the coming time of universal brotherhood. There ought to be some point of 
  influential contact between Masonry and the social order whereby the public 
  might profit by a knowledge of what it is trying to do in the world. This work 
  cannot be accomplished by one Grand Lecturer, whose hands are full by reason 
  of the demands of the Order. It might be feasible for each Masonic 
  jurisdiction to maintain a sort of university extension course-- to have a 
  number of really qualified lecturers, who could not only interpret the work to 
  Masons in the lodgeroom, but who in addition, could elucidate the broad 
  principles of human brotherhood to the great world outside.
   
  This program of education is 
  a necessity if Freemasonry is to avoid the risk of being left behind in the 
  progress of the race. The meaning of such a statement may be illustrated by 
  reference to one of the familiar bits of our history. One of the stock stories 
  frequently heard at Masonic banquets, is the incident of the wounded Mason on 
  the battlefield giving the hailing sign of distress and being rescued and 
  cared for by one of the enemy who was a brother Mason. It is always recited as 
  a triumph of Masonic sentiment and principle. But without minifying the value 
  of such a manifestation of fraternity, it may be declared that the real 
  triumph of Masonry will not be seen in the world until its influence is so 
  felt and applied, that brother Masons will never be compelled, by personal 
  ambition and arbitrary power, to face one another in deadly combat on the 
  battlefield. And that end can only be attained by a persistent and prolonged 
  process of general education on the basis of the principle of brotherhood. 
  Freemasonry cannot be content simply with the rescue of an individual here and 
  there from the horrors of actual warfare; it must strive by every means in its 
  power to bring to humanity the lasting era of peace.
   
  Our point may also be 
  illustrated by a reference to our familiar work of charity. Freemasonry is 
  philanthropic. No little time and thought are given in such gatherings as this 
  to the work of relief and the sustaining of charitable institutions. Our 
  fraternity responds to the cry of distress with open-handed generosity; but 
  the giving of alms is only the kindergarten course in human relief. The Good 
  Samaritan was faithful to his immediate duty when he took care of the 
  unfortunate victim of thieves on the Jericho road. It has been suggested, 
  however, that the modern Samaritan has been extending his work of travelers' 
  aid. He has been inquiring about the antecedents of the thieves and seeking to 
  know why the boys in Jerusalem and Jericho are growing up as criminals; he has 
  been wanting to know why the authorities do not give protection to those whose 
  business calls them to and fro between the two cities. He is no longer content 
  simply to exercise humane offices in behalf of the individual who has become 
  the victim of preying criminals and negligent authorities.
   
  Thus, in the nature of 
  things, we must add to our work of relief, some inquiry into the reasons why 
  appeals for help are being made from time to time. And if it is discovered 
  that many of these burdens have been thrown upon Masonry by reason of wrong 
  and oppression in the social order, then Masonry must do its part in the 
  righting of the wrongs and in the prevention of such injustice. It is childish 
  to imagine that a great order will always be content to care for specific 
  cases of want, without inquiring as to the causes of the want it is called 
  upon to relieve. These things, certainly practical and pressing in character, 
  simply serve to show that we must give new attention to the Masonic deal of 
  knowledge. 
   
  ----o----
   
  LIGHT ON THE HILLS
   
  Forget thy sorrow, heart of 
  mine;
  Though shadows fall and fades 
  the leaf
  Somewhere is joy, though 'tis 
  not thine;
  The power that sent can heal 
  thy grief:
  And light lies on the farther 
  hills.
   
  Thou wouldst not with the 
  world be one
  If ne'er thou knowest hurt 
  and wrong;
  Take comfort, though the 
  darkened sun
  Never again bring gleam or 
  song--
  And light lies on the farther 
  hills.
  --Richard Watson Gilder.
   
  ----o----
   
  MEXICAN MASONRY, ANOTHER SIDE
   
  BY BRO. EBER COLE RYAM 
  ILLINOIS
   
  I HAVE read with interest the 
  article on Masonry by Brother John Lewin McLeish, published in the June issue 
  of The Builder, and heartily agree with his abhorrence of needless bloodshed. 
  I have read, with him, the excerpt from the writings of Albert Pike, and again 
  agree with him--as I assume he agrees with Pike--that "wars, like 
  thunderstorms, are necessary to purify the stagnant atmosphere;" and again, 
  that "a war for a great principle ennobles a nation." But did anyone ever hear 
  of any people ever going to war except to assert "a great principle ?" Are not 
  each and every one of the powers now at war fighting for that greatest of all 
  principles--"national existence ?" Even the United States Government, when 
  persuaded to attack Vera Cruz, in order to deprive Huerta of his source of 
  revenue, pleaded a point of honor," and urged the flimsy pretext of demanding 
  "a salute to the flag," whereas, as a matter of fact, the greatest dishonor to 
  that flag was the abandonment to possible massacre of helpless men, women and 
  children. I refer to the withdrawal of the American warships from Tampico. Had 
  it not been for the energy and determination of the German commander in 
  rescuing from the infuriated mob those American citizens, who had been 
  abandoned by their government, a horrible massacre would have been recorded.
   
  Bro. McLeish refers to the 
  article in the New Age for August, 1915, written by "a high Mexican Masonic 
  brother." Does Bro. McLeish vouch for this "Brother?" I think not. So far as I 
  am informed, the particular brand of Masonry that this "Brother" represents is 
  "clandestine," and, therefore, not recognized by "regular Masons," and for 
  very good and sufficient reasons, of which Bro. McLeish is perfectly aware.
   
  Latin American Masonry is 
  atheistic, revolutionary and contentious, and in Mexico it has become 
  anarchistic and murderous. Whatever moral lessons--if any-- are inculcated in 
  its "lodges," they are certainly forgotten entirely when outside of them.
   
  Bro. McLeish omits to mention 
  the name of the "high Mexican Masonic Brother,"--very likely because that name 
  means nothing to him, but it might help in the illumination of events, past, 
  present and to come, if ; this "brother's" name were known.
   
  In championing the cause of 
  the Mexican Revolution, Bro. McLeish is actuated by the most exalted motives 
  of human sympathy and unquestionably is convinced that what "Bro." Jose 
  Castellot says is gospel truth inspired by motives as equally sincere. As for 
  Senior Castellot himself, I can only say to him that I have lived years in 
  Mexico; I speak the language; I have the honor of knowing some of those who 
  have served Mexico faithfully and well, and I have read a part--at least--of 
  its long stormy history. But about Senior Castellot and his article I would 
  like to remind Bro. McLeish that a close reading of it will disclose the fact 
  that while it has a wealth of charges it is poor indeed in citations of fact. 
  Unfortunately, these charges all agree with what Bro. McLeish and I were 
  taught to expect and to accept as true. They agree with our inherited 
  prejudices--prejudices that have persisted in spite the teachings of our lofty 
  Masonic ideals of Truth, Charity and Toleration. These inherited prejudices of 
  ours go back to the days of the Spanish Armada and the Reformation. We 
  remember only the disagreeable events of the reign of "Bloody Mary," and only 
  the agreeable events of that of the "Virgin Queen." The histories we studied 
  are conveniently apologetic and frankly laudative about "Good Queen Bess," 
  while they spare no censure for Mary. They fail to make prominent the fact 
  that in that day, religion being a state affair, the state considered 
  abandonment of the state religion as treason to the state. We have taken 
  certain things for granted; have assumed them to be axiomatic, and in that 
  assumption have measured evenly statement by that rule. If the statements 
  agree with our preconceived opinions, well and good; if not, we give them no 
  credence.
   
  We are prepared to credit any 
  story coming out of Mexico which charges oppression of the poor by the Church 
  and the well-to-do; that the lands of the poor were taken from them by the 
  Church which sought to keep them in ignorance that there might be no protest; 
  that the Church was gorged with wealth and that Mexico was "priest-ridden."
   
  Even if all these charges 
  were true, would it merit the endorsement by American Masons of the horrible 
  outrages which Senor Castellot condemns in one breath and condones in another? 
  But are these charges true ? What evidence has been produced to prove them? 
  They have been repeated again and again by innumerable travellers and writers 
  who deal in generalities but avoid particulars. But where is the evidence, 
  where are the facts to prove them justified?
   
  Masonry teaches us to be just 
  and fair. Is it fair, then, to accept heal say evidence such as this--to 
  accept the word of those who, obviously, are prejudiced witnesses ?
   
  In Mexico the Spanish 
  conquerors found a people possessing a civilization not greatly different from 
  that of our Southwestern Indians. But there was this difference--they were 
  cannibals, and cannibals of a most horrible kind. This does not agree with 
  Prescott, but it agrees with the facts. The early conquerors made slaves of 
  some of these natives, but when they were all freed the number was found to be 
  151,000 men. This freedom was by older of the Pope and the Spanish Government. 
  Pope Paul III decreed in a Bull issued June 17th, 1537, that the natives were 
  by right free and with full right to own property, and that under no 
  circumstances were they to be deprived of their liberties or their properties, 
  nor in any manner to be made slaves. The Christian missionaries were active, 
  not only in preaching the Gospel and baptizing the natives, but were 
  particularly zealous in protecting them from the white immigrants. The Spanish 
  Government, at the earnest solicitation of the Churchmen, (Las Casas and 
  others), decreed a series of laws which have been declared by those who have 
  studied them the most enlightened laws ever enacted for the government and 
  protection of a primitive people. Under these laws the Indians of Mexico 
  really prospered until the War of Independence. They were confirmed in the 
  possession of their communal lands and were permitted practically to govern 
  themselves. They were exempt from all tithes and taxes of every kind except a 
  payment of $1.25 per year per man. The Attorney General was their official 
  protector, and in court actions they paid no attorney's fees nor court costs.
   
  That the Church made an 
  honest effort to educate them is proven by the long list of educational 
  institutions founded for their benefit. As a matter of fact, Mexico, in 
  colonial days, was noted for its educational institutions. Of course, the 
  Church was in charge of most of these, but that should be to its credit. The 
  only reason there were no more was because the Church lacked the numbers and 
  funds for the purpose.
   
  A careful examination of the 
  records will show that the Church establishment in Mexico has provided 
  spiritual services with a far less proportionate number of clergy, and for a 
  minute fraction of the sum per capita, than is done in the United States 
  today. The monks and nuns were mostly engaged in educational work and the 
  great monasteries and convents were in reality schools and colleges.
   
  One writer, in a burst of 
  enthusiasm to prove the riches of the nuns, tells of the income derived from 
  all their properties and invested funds. This great sum divided among the 1847 
  nuns in Mexico gave $1.14 per day each, and this did not count the servants 
  and the students who were more numerous than the nuns, and had to be supported 
  from the same fund.
   
  Another item overlooked is 
  that all the Church schools were free. Before 1857 the schools in Mexico were 
  mostly under the management of the Church, and the curriculum was as advanced 
  as in any other schools of the same period. The Laws of Reform closed all 
  these schools and prohibited the clergy from teaching, and ordered the monks 
  and nuns out of the country, and confiscated their properties. The much 
  exaggerated riches of the Church were in reality the endowments devoted to the 
  maintenance of universities, colleges, academies, schools, orphanages, 
  hospitals, and other benevolent purposes. The Government confiscated these 
  funds and let the institutions go hang. Because the Churchmen protested 
  against these outrages they were accused of "meddling in politics." Suppose 
  some political party were to attempt to confiscate all the Masonic funds and 
  properties,--would Masons submit without vigorous protest? Hardly! The Church 
  in Mexico was stripped and had the melancholy satisfaction of witnessing the 
  chagrin and rage of the strippers because the booty was so much below their 
  calculations.
   
  The Laws of Reform were not 
  aimed at securing freedom of worship, but at the spoilation of the Catholic 
  Church. Some justification was, of course, necessary even to themselves for 
  such an act, and so we have had repeated to us a multitude of charges which, 
  upon impartial investigation, are found without proof. Even under the Spanish 
  Crown the Church had no such freedom of action as is permitted any church in 
  the United States today. The records will show that the Church revenues were 
  the reverse of what we have been led to believe, and of this revenue 
  two-ninths was paid to the Spanish Crown as a tax; not to mention the 
  appropriation of endowment funds which were never repaid.
   
  The Laws of Reform denied 
  clergymen the right to dress in any way indicative of their calling; denied 
  the Church the right to own or administer property; to receive bequests or 
  endowments for any purpose; denied it the right to operate schools and its 
  clergy to teach in any manner except theology. The Government took possession 
  of everything, including the churches with their contents, and all that was 
  permitted the priests was to conduct religious services in them, but they 
  could receive no support by trust funds nor from revenues of any property. In 
  other words, they were limited to the free-will offering which might be 
  tendered at the time of the service rendered. How would the American churches 
  like to be restricted in this manner ?
   
  Of course, if Masons are 
  ready to admit that they are seeking to destroy the Catholic Church,--wipe it 
  out of existence,--then I have nothing to say; but I am persuaded that this is 
  farthest from their thoughts, and that they are as ready to condemn such 
  unjust restrictions and confiscations against the Catholic Church as they 
  would be to condemn any such like acts against the Methodist, or Baptist or 
  Presbyterian Church. I am persuaded that American Masons wish to be just and 
  fair to everybody--even to those who are frankly opposed to them. The Catholic 
  Church is frankly opposed to Masonry, and bases its opposition on the ground 
  that Masonry is a church, a religion, the same as the Methodist or the Baptist 
  Church, or any one of the other ninety odd different varieties. Some Masons 
  even are under this impression, which is altogether erroneous, as all 
  thoughtful Masons will agree. Masonry is no more a Church than the Oddfellows, 
  or the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers. But American Masonry does teach 
  those virtues which the Latin branch of the craft seems pre-eminently to 
  lack,-- along with a proper perspective, knowledge of their own history and a 
  sense of humor. 
   
  American Masons had best 
  inquire closely into the antecedents of Mexican revolutions, and their 
  leaders, before extending any sympathy which later may prove embarrassing.
   
  Since the War of Mexican 
  Independence, a militant minority-- composed largely of socialistic 
  "reformers," directing a collection of baser elements engaged in the 
  enterprise for purposes of pillage--has dominated the majority. This has been 
  made possible because of the heterogeneous elements in the Mexican population, 
  which is composed of some fifty different Indian tribes, speaking as many 
  different languages and preserving many of their pre-Columbian antagonisms. 
  These are uniformly ignorant, not because of any lack of opportunity but 
  because of a congenital conservatism which avoids everything new. Between the 
  educated white elements and the Indians are the mixed bloods, inheriting 
  sometimes good and sometimes bad. The presence of so many primitive 
  characteristics,--so many that are in reality of the cave men and the Stone 
  Age, has given Mexico a high percentage of mental defectives and criminals of 
  the lower order. In addition to this, the student class has furnished a number 
  of recruits to the socialist ranks, and the Latin socialist is a 
  'direct-actionist," impatient to destroy all of our present civilization in 
  order to remake it to his own liking. It is from such elements as these that 
  we have the present revolution. Even the "sainted Madero," well intentioned as 
  he was, recruited his forces from the jails and the cattle rustlers, such as 
  Villa and others like him. Madero's successors have not improved either in 
  motives or in material. The result is that we have today in Mexico a condition 
  just exactly such as might be expected from the teachings of Debs, Heywood, 
  Mother Jones and Emma Goldman. And Senor Castellot is another of like kidney. 
  Do American Masons vouch for this ? I think not.
   
  I am not in accord with the 
  philosophy of the Catholic Church, neither do I subscribe to that of the 
  Church of England, nor the Methodist Church, nor the Baptist Church, nor to 
  any other church. But I do believe that each church has a right to existence, 
  to carry on its work amongst its followers, and to enjoy individually the same 
  freedom accorded to all the rest. An attack upon any one of the churches will 
  lead inevitably to attacks upon all the others. Whichever happens to be the 
  largest becomes the object of attack; he field unites against it. Nor do these 
  attacks stop at the churches; they inevitably spread to all other property 
  interests, for, fundamentally, they are inspired by envy and cupidity. Hence, 
  it has been in Mexico that the attacks upon the Church have been directed to 
  its spoilation and from that they have turned upon all owners of property with 
  the purpose of destroying the very foundations of society. Not content with 
  destroying the Church and driving the clergy from the country, they have 
  turned their "reforming" attentions to the land owners, the shop owners and 
  all employers of labor. These they have murdered or driven from the country, 
  and have closed or destroyed the industrial establishments. The laboring 
  classes for whom they were so solicitous are now without employment and are 
  starving. The same revolutionary elements which have destroyed all semblance 
  of law and government in Mexico and made of it a shambles, are actively at 
  work in the United States, seeking to destroy our present industrial and 
  social civilization. For the details of their intentions and desires I refer 
  those interested to the literature published by the Industrial Workers of the 
  World; for the Mexican Revolution is an I. W. W. Revolution.
   
  I am confident that Masons 
  unreservedly and heartily will condemn this Mexican revolution when its real 
  inspiration, its real motives and its real results are made known to them.
  
   
  ----o----
   
  MASONIC SIGNERS OF THE 
  DECLARATION
   
  Peyton Randolph, president of 
  the first Continental Congress, in 1774, was Provincial Grand Master of 
  Virginia; but he died and was succeeded by John Hancock.
   
  John Hancock was raised in 
  Merchants' Lodge; Quebec, in 1760, and affiliated with St. Andrew's, Boston, 
  in 1763.
   
  Josiah Bartlett, Grand Master 
  of Massachusetts.
   
  Wm. Whipple, Library Masonic 
  History, vol. IV.
   
  Matthew Thornton, same.
   
  Samuel Adams, member of St. 
  John's Lodge, Bos
   
  John Adams, same. See 
  Proceedings of Massachusetts G. L., 1733-92.
   
  Robert Treat Paine, Elbridge 
  Gerry, Roger Sherman, Oliver Wolcott, Philip Livingstone, Franz Lewis, John 
  Witherspoon, Francis Hopkinson, Robert Morris, Benjamin Rush., Library Masonic 
  History, vol. IV.
   
  Benjamin Franklin, Great 
  Master of St. John's Lodge, Boston.
   
  George Ross and Richard Henry 
  Lee, Library Masonic History, IV.
   
  Thomas Jefferson, on rolls of 
  Lodge of Nine Muses in Paris.
   
  Thomas Nelson Jr., Benjamin 
  Harrison, Francis Lightfoot Lee, and Wm. Hopper, Grand Lodge Proceedings of 
  Virginia, 1788-1822.
   
  ----o----
   
  THE HOUSE OF LIFE
   
  Strange the world around me 
  lies,
  Never yet familiar grown,
  Still disturbs me with 
  surprise,
  Haunts me, like a face 
  unknown.
  In this house with starry 
  dome,
  Floor'd with gemlike plains 
  and seas,
  Shall I never feel at home,
  Never wholly be at ease?
  On from room to room I stray,
  Yet my Host can ne'er espy,
  And I know not to this day
  Whether guest or captive I.
  --William Watson.
   
  ----o----
   
  
  EDITORIAL
  
   
  
  MARQUIS DE LAFAYETTE
  
   
  
  MUCH was said during the early days of the 
  world‑war now raging as to the attitude of our Republic in the crisis; and 
  opinions differed regarding our debt to France as compared with that to 
  Germany, for aid given during our War of the Revolution. Both of those 
  countries sent assistance of various kinds. Whatever the degree of obligation, 
  it is the simple fact that of all the men who came over to aid the colonists 
  in their struggle, the name of Lafayette has come down to us with a peculiar 
  lustre. Questions have been raised as to the motives, high or low, 
  disinterested or selfish, which led these men into the war. Bearing upon this 
  question, in respect of Lafayette, it is interesting to read what is said 
  about him in "The Household of the Lafayettes," by Edith Sichel, as follows:
  
   
  
  "One night, in 1776, the Marshal de Broglie was 
  giving a dinner party in honor of the Duke of Gloucester. This light-hearted 
  brother of George III regaled the company with accounts of the American 
  revolt, and especially of the affair of the tea in Boston Harbor. His sympathy 
  was with the rebels, and he dwelt on their need of recruits. The guests were 
  men of high rank, and gorgeous uniforms were much in evidence. Almost 
  unnoticed among them sat a young man of nineteen, silent, solemn, absorbed in 
  listening; he was thin, red‑haired, hook‑nosed, and awkward. After the dinner 
  was over, he strode across the hall to the Duke of Gloucester, outwardly calm, 
  but repressing deep emotion. "I will join those Americans," he cried. "I will 
  help them fight for freedom. Tell me how to set about it." He was the Marquis 
  de Lafayette, not long married; and it has been said of him that his whole 
  life was ruled by two passions - love for his wife, and love of freedom."
  
   
  
  Ninety‑two years ago New York City witnessed the 
  most enthusiastic celebration of the birthday of Lafayette in the history of 
  our Republic. Lafayette himself was present, on his final and memorable visit 
  to the country whose struggle for independence he so nobly aided. Instead of 
  thirteen weak colonies he found twenty‑four prosperous States. His journey 
  through the States was an ovation of patriotic gratitude and pride, and he 
  returned ladened with all the honors which a nation can bestow. On May 20th, 
  1834, he died in Paris in his seventy‑seventh year - a gracious gentleman, a 
  knightly soldier, an honored and beloved member of the Masonic fraternity.
  
   
  
  * * *
  
   
  
  THE WORKS OF PIKE
  
   
  
  At last we are to have, what many of our readers 
  have no doubt long desired, a carefully edited set of the works of Albert 
  Pike, one volume of which is to be a biography by his daughter, Lilian Pike 
  Roome. It runs to six volumes, the first two of which will be ready shortly, 
  and exhibits the many‑sided interest and activity of a myriad‑minded man who 
  was explorer, hunter, teacher, soldier, poet, scholar, jurist, orator, 
  philologist, philosopher, and a master genius of Masonry. Lyrics and Love 
  Songs fill the first volume, followed by the Hymns to the Gods and other Poems 
  - some of them never before published; while the third volume is the story of 
  his life, told with painstaking accuracy and wealth of detail; revealing a 
  rich and fruitful career touching all the elements of romance, adventure and 
  achievement, from the wild Indian tribes in the Southwest to the high altar of 
  the House of the Temple. A volume of Recollections will include his travel 
  sketches and short stories, another is made up of Letters, and Addresses on 
  various occasions - Masonic, academic and legal - and a final volume of 
  selections from his Masonic Allocutions and other writings in exposition or 
  defense of the Craft.
  
   
  
  For years ye editor has had it in‑mind to write a 
  Life and Study of Albert Pike, but has delayed doing so at the request of his 
  daughter, who wished her biography of her father to be the first in the field. 
  So, and naturally so, there has been a revision of our plan, limiting our 
  study to the Masonic labors of Pike, which his daughter, with all her filial 
  piety and devotion, could hardly interpret. There is need for such a book, 
  just as is a sore need for a new edition of "Morals and Dogma," which is 
  little more than a compilation, and which ought to be revised, re‑edited, 
  re‑arranged, many parts of it recast, if not rewritten, in behalf of clarity 
  and simplicity - as, for example, the brief exposition of the Doctrine of the 
  Balance in our last issue. It is a vast mountain of ore, with many a nugget of 
  gem‑like truth sparkling in the sunlight, but it needs to be worked and its 
  treasures recast in the molds of today and interpreted to the young men 
  entering the Order. As it is, few Masons read Morals and Dogma through, and 
  fewer still understand it, when, in fact, its teaching is very simple when 
  clarified and made vivid.
  
   
  
  Masons everywhere, and many who are not members of 
  the Order, will welcome the Works of Pike, and the story of his life will 
  recall to this generation the memory of a truly great American, who has not 
  received the honor to which he is entitled; a man imperious by nature, but 
  gracious withal and lovable; a stately, grave and noble genius devoted to the 
  highest things - a poet to whom the world was a song, a Mason to whom the 
  world was a temple of the Eternal Beauty, Wisdom, and Love. (1)
  
   
  
  * * *
  
   
  
  STUDY CLUBS
  
   
  
  Most heartily and earnestly we commend the Open 
  Letter to Our Members, by Brother R.I. Clegg, in the September issue, inviting 
  a closer fellowship and cooperation in the study of Masonry. The spirit of the 
  letter is as admirable as its plan is practical, and we bespeak for it the 
  careful attention of our Members, the more so because it involves the welfare 
  of the Society which has no other aim but to spread light and to promote a 
  finer, closer fellowship among Masons. The response so far to the Open Letter 
  is most encouraging, and we feel that the Society is now at the beginning, in 
  a tangible way, of what is perhaps the most important part of the work which 
  it was founded to do. Its organization, its journal, its activity were all 
  intended with this purpose in view; and we believe that it will yet work out 
  as it was planned, albeit at no little cost of labor and sacrifice, and that 
  it will mark the opening of a new era in American Masonry. The fact that 
  Brother Clegg, who is one of the ablest Masonic students among us, has 
  undertaken to lead in the development of the Study Club program, means much, 
  uniting as he does sincere Masonic interest with practical acumen. No man 
  could be better fitted for such a labor, and we are sure that the end of 
  another season will find the work well along its way toward the ideal set up 
  to be hit. Space permits us only to add our earnest Amen to the plan, and to 
  promise our aid in promoting it to the utmost.
  
   
  
  * * *
  
   
  
  We are deeply grateful to Brother Clegg for his 
  labor in editing the September issue of The Builder, while we were away on the 
  other side of the sea. It was a gracious and brotherly service, alike in the 
  spirit and manner in which it was done. Our only fear is that our own work 
  will seem flat, tame and amateurish by contrast.
  
   
  
  * * *
  
   
  
  The sermons preached by ye editor in the City 
  Temple, London, during the month of July, are to be published in a little 
  volume by Revell & Co., New York - the volume taking its title from the first 
  sermon, "An Ambassador." Should any reader of The Builder venture to read the 
  book, we can only hope that the punishment will not be held to exceed that 
  prescribed in the by‑laws of the Society.
  
   
  
  ----o---
  
   
  
  (1) Works of Albert Pike, edited by Lilian Pike 
  Roome. Published by Allsopp & Chapple, Little Rock, Ark. 12 mo., 300 pages to 
  Vol., Illustrated, $1.50 each; half Mor., $2.50. First two vols ready Sept. 
  1st, 1916; other vols. three months apart.
  
   
  
  ----o----
  
   
  
  BAHAI SAYINGS
  
   
  
  Blessed is he who is charitable, for he shall 
  inherit Eternal Life.
  
  Blessed is he who overlooks the faults of others, 
  for he shall enjoy Divine Beatitude.
  
  Blessed is he who associates with all with joy and 
  fragrance, for he has obeyed the commands of Baha Ullah.
  
  Blessed is he who is kind to his enemies, for he 
  has walked in the footsteps of Christ.
  
  Blessed is he who proclaims the doctrine of 
  Spiritual Brotherhood, for he shall be the Child of Light.
  
  Blessed is he whose heart is tender and 
  compassionate, for he will throw stones at no one.
  
   
  
  Words of Abdul Baha.
  
   
  
  ----o----
  
   
  
  THE THINGS I MISS
  
   
  
  An easy thing, O Power Divine, 
  
  To thank thee for these gifts of thine! 
  
  
  For summer's sunshine, winter's snow, 
  
  
  For hearts that kindle, thoughts that glow. 
  
  
  But when shall I attain to this - 
  
  
  To thank thee for the things I miss? 
  
  
  For all young Fancy's early gleams, 
  
  
  The dreamed-of joys that still are dreams, 
  
  
  Hopes unfulfilled, and pleasures known 
  
  
  Through others' fortunes, not my own, 
  
  
  And blessings seen that are not given, 
  
  
  And never will be, this side heaven. 
  
  
  Had I too shared the joys I see, 
  
  
  Would there have been a heaven for me? 
  
  
  Could I have felt thy presence near 
  
  
  Had I possessed what I held dear? 
  
  
  My deepest fortune, highest bliss, 
  
  
  Have grown perchance from things I miss. 
  
  
  Sometimes there comes an hour of calm; 
  
  
  Grief turns to blessing, pain to balm; 
  
  
  A power that works above my will 
  
  
  Still leads me onward, upward still; 
  
  
  And then my heart attains to this, - 
  
  
  To thank thee for the things I miss.
  
   
  
  - Thomas Wentworth Higginson.
  
   
  
  ----o----
  
   
  
  THE BIBLE
  
   
  
  Out from the heart of nature rolled 
  
  
  The burdens of the Bible old; 
  
  The litanies of nations came, 
  
  Like the volcano's tongue of flame, 
  
  
  Up from the burning core below, - 
  
  
  The canticles of love and woe. 
  
  The word unto the prophet spoken 
  
  
  Was writ on tables yet unbroken; 
  
  
  The word by seers or sybils told, 
  
  
  In groves of oak, or fanes of gold, 
  
  
  Still floats upon the morning wind, 
  
  
  Still whispers to the willing mind 
  
  
  One accent of the Holy Ghost 
  
  The heedless world hath never lost.
  
   
  
  - R. W. Emerson.
  
   
  
  ----o----
  
   
  
  PATRIOT AND PARTISAN
  
   
  
  A patriot is a man who regards the enemies of his 
  country as his personal enemies: a partisan is a man who regards his personal 
  enemies as the enemies of his country. - Henry Clay.
  
   
  
  ----o----
  
   
  
  THE HIDDEN CHURCH
  
   
  
  Beyond all wealth, honor, or even health is the 
  attachment we form to all noble souls, because to become one with the good, 
  generous and true, is to become, in a measure, good, generous and true. - 
  Thomas Arnold.
  
   
  
  ----o----
  
   
  
  THE LIBRARY
  
   
  
  WHITCOMB RILEY
  
   
  
  ALAS ! there is a vacant chair in the Library. 
  While ye Scribe was on the other side of the sea, one of his best beloved 
  poets passed quietly away to where, beyond these voices, there is peace. He 
  was a gracious, kindly, wise and brotherly man, a great uninitiated Mason,and 
  though the singer has vanished, his songs still sing. We venture to reproduce 
  a little tribute written some months ago, while he was still with us, 
  concerning which he wrote us a very kind note. It speaks for itself:
  
   
  
  No man among us has ever received less of critical 
  estimate, as a poet, than Whitcomb Riley. People would only get mad and sit 
  back and call names if any one attempted to study him in that manner. They do 
  not care to analyze his genius, or to set him in order among other singers. 
  They just love him - because he is a man made to be loved. They love him as a 
  friend as one who knows them and the life they live, and who has “figgered 
  out" a simple and hopeful way of living it; and they hold that he is a man 
  altogether worthy of being loved.
  
   
  
  Riley was born at Greenfield, Indiana, in 1854, 
  the son of Ruben Riley, a lawyer of that town - a blue-eyed, tow-haired, 
  happy-hearted boy who saw pictures in the pastures, and heard melodies in the 
  rustle of the wind in the corn. He began to study law in his father's office, 
  and got along very well in winter time, but reading Blackstone "knee-deep in 
  June" was impossible. So, when a patent-medicine man drifted into town needing 
  a boy to beat the drum, Riley enlisted. Autumn found him far from home, 
  stranded, and he had to paint signs to work his way back. This is what his 
  biographers mean when they speak of him as "a traveling actor in his youth."
  
   
  
  After that, he became local editor of the Anderson 
  Democrat, his duty being to record the fact that John Jones had gone to 
  Kokomo, and that Mrs. Jeremiah Snodgrass, of Greencastle, was visiting in 
  town. But soon he began to mix odd prankish bits of verse with his items and 
  his paper was more sought after than a comic almanac. All the while he was 
  writing verses and sending them to the magazines, and always they were 
  returned, until he decided that no poem not even Paradise Lost, signed J. W. 
  Riley, would ever be published. Howbeit, he sent a poem called "The Old 
  Swimmin' Hole" to the Indianapolis Journal, and it was printed. But he signed 
  it "Ben F. Johnson, of Boone," and when the editor went to hunt Johnson he 
  found Riley.
  
   
  
  Grace, charm and melody are the obvious traits of 
  Riley as a poet. But not one of these gifts, nor all of them together, can 
  account for his hold upon us. No, people love Riley because of his pictures of 
  our common human life, with its joys and sorrows, its blend of humor and 
  pathos - life seen, for the most part, as a mirage through the prism of 
  memory. He is the singer of the days of long ago, when life was new and 
  wonderful, and whence our eyes are so often turned back pensively, knowing 
  that those days come not back. He has, at times, the dramatic touch, as in 
  "Good-bye, Jim," and the quick surprise of tears, as in "Nothin' to Say," 
  mingled with the homely, wholesome philosophy of his dialect pieces.
  
   
  
  Riley is as truly American as Mark Twain. Poe 
  might just as well have done his work in Bagdad, for all the influence that 
  his native land had upon his poetry. Our Yankee singers seemed to have been 
  derived from England. Whitman, to be sure, sought to interpret the vague, 
  vast, abundant spirit of America, but he did not often attain to poetic form. 
  But in mental habit, in gesture of soul, in temper, spirit and feeling Riley 
  is always American. He sings of simple things, of human life, of joys and 
  sorrows and beauties that remain whatever kings and empires may be doing or 
  undoing. God Be thanked for a poet of common sense and every-day life, for a 
  singer in whom "thought grew tired of wandering over the world and home-bound 
  fancy ran her bark ashore."
  
   
  
  Riley has never married, but he has made his peace 
  with the women through the children. Such poems as "The Bear story," and "Who 
  Santa Claus Wuz," and "Out at Old Aunt Mary's" - not to name "The Little White 
  Hearse" - show that he is a citizen of Never, Never Land. Yet he is a poet who 
  writes about children, not a children's poet - like Eugene Field.
  
   
  
  His song is of childhood as we who are older 
  remember it, not as the child knows and sees it. That is why we who have not 
  let the boy and girl die in us love him, for that he reminds us of those fair, 
  lost days which we never wholly forget, and never wholly remember, when life 
  was stainless and free from cares that fret and sins that defile.
  
   
  
  That is Riley, God bless him! He knows that the 
  Goddess of Beauty still holds her court in the dell where the fire-flies 
  bestar her leafy firmament. Still for him the dew is on the clover and the 
  drone of busy bees makes melody among the flowers. Now as of yore, for him, 
  good fairies, crowned with silveriest moonlight, perch upon the window-sill 
  and sing chuckling songs to good children, and fire-eyed, gratchy-fingered 
  goblins will get the bad ones "ef you don't watch out." The rose has still her 
  hinted secret for the curious breeze, and down by the old swimming hole of 
  youth
  
   
  
  "The dragon-fly in light 
  
  Gauzy armor, burnished bright, 
  
  Comes a-tilting down the water 
  
  In a wild bewildered flight."
  
   
  
  And in the autumn-time, "when the frost is on the 
  pumpkin and the fodder's in the shock" the cobwebs carpet the November 
  lowlands with a glittering weft of beauty, finer by far than ever a Fairy wove 
  on her airy loom. Blessed is the man who can see these things, and who by his 
  art can make us look, listen, and remember.
  
   
  
  And now that he belongs to a time that is gone and 
  to the people who are no longer with us here - gone to join the Great White 
  Lodge - there come to mind those lines in which he was wont to say good-bye 
  when death robbed him of his friends; the familiar and simple lines beginning,
  
   
  
  "I cannot say, and I will not say
  
  That he is dead. - He is just away."
  
   
  
  * * *
  
   
  
  THE EASTERN STAR
  
   
  
  Baring-Gould wrote learnedly of the myths of the 
  Middle Ages, but the myths of Masonry still await the touch of a master hand. 
  They are many and various, one of them being that Adoptive Masonry was 
  introduced into this country in 1780, Washington and Lafayette constituting 
  the first chapter. Adoptive Masonry - or more accurately Androgynous Masonry, 
  from two Greek words signifying Man and Woman, was established in France as 
  early as 1730; and an edition of the French ritual was printed in Philadelphia 
  in 1768. Albert Pike made an English translation of it about 1874, revised and 
  amplified, but efforts to establish lodges proved futile. Faint traces of 
  something like the Eastern Star are reported in Boston in 1798, if we may 
  judge from a poem published in the Columbian Centinel of that date; and even 
  earlier in a pamphlet entitled "The Thesauros of the Ancient and Honorable 
  Order of the Eastern Star," 1793 - this, however, is of doubtful authenticity, 
  too uncertain to be trusted.
  
   
  
  Robert Morris, of Kentucky, claimed to have 
  originated the Order of the Eastern Star, and affirmed that "no one can show 
  any proofs of its existence prior to 1849." Whereas the fact seems to have 
  been that he received the degree of the Eastern Star at that time at the hands 
  of Giles M. Hillyer, of Vicksburg, Miss. Nor is there apparently any record of 
  where Hillyer got the rite. Morris took the rite in a crude form, elaborated 
  and embellished it - much as Pike did the Scottish Rite - and started it 
  toward organization; whereof we may read in his "Lights and Shadows of 
  Masonry." Certainly, as it now exists, he builded better than he knew, and the 
  Order is his monument. All of which is duly set forth in authentic form in 
  "The History of the Order of the Eastern Star," by W. D. Engle, an able and 
  admirable book, tracing the growth of the Order, its Grand bodies, its 
  rituals, its objects and landmarks, its various Grand Chapters, and its home 
  and charity work. This volume may be had by addressing the author, Masonic 
  Temple, Indianapolis, Ind., $2.50.
  
   
  
  * * *
  
   
  
  FOREGLEAMS
  
   
  
  The second volume of the Transactions of the 
  Author's Lodge, of London, is expected to appear this month, and is a book to 
  which Masonic students will look forward. We had the pleasure of meeting its 
  editor, Brother Albert F. Calvert, while in England, and it is a joy to 
  announce that our readers are to have the opportunity of meeting him in these 
  pages in the not distant future.
  
   
  
  * * * 
  
   
  
  Another forthcoming book, which will be awaited 
  with interest, is the work of Brother Dr. Hammond, Librarian of the Grand 
  Lodge of England, and will be descriptive of the treasures of the Library over 
  which he presides. It will be finely illustrated, as we can testify after 
  looking over the plates, and besides the account of the Library it will 
  contain an introductory essay by Brother Hammond on the origin and development 
  of the Craft. Brother Hammond will also be among our contributors not many 
  months hence, in celebration of the bi-centennial of the Mother Grand Lodge.
  
   
  
  * * *
  
   
  
  Most heartily and earnestly we join in the request 
  that Brother A. S. MacBride, of the Lodge of Progress, Glasgow, publish 
  another volume of his Masonic studies. Surely his volume of lectures, entitled 
  "Speculative Masonry," is one of the best Masonic books ever written, and we 
  sincerely hope that it may be only one of many from the same pen. One of the 
  happiest days of our journey abroad was a visit to Glasgow, and the reception 
  given us by the Lodge of Progress, of which Brother MacBride is the honored 
  and beloved leader. Concerning this famous Lodge and its distinguished leader 
  we shall have much to say shortly, in the travel sketches we have it in mind 
  to record.
  
   
  
  * * *
  
   
  
  Years ago Brother George Fleming Moore remarked 
  that the true history of the Scottish Rite has never been written, and that is 
  the fact. Rumor has reached us of a History of the Rite now being written, and 
  we devoutly hope and believe that this is the book we have been waiting for. 
  While we are not yet permitted to announce the name of the author, we are sure 
  that it will be a thorough and careful piece of work and will do much to clear 
  the air of fog and set forth the facts in a true light.
  
   
  
  * * *
  
   
  
  BOOKS RECEIVED
  
   
  
  Was Jesus an Essene?, by Dudley Wright. Unity 
  Publishing Society, Kansas City, Mo. 25 cents net.
  
   
  
  The Adventure of Death, by R. W. Mackenna. John 
  Murray, London. $1.00.
  
   
  
  Hinduism, The World Ideal, by H. Maitra. Palmer & 
  Haywood, London. 75 cents.
  
   
  
  Ancient India, by H. Oldenberg. Open Court Pub. 
  Co., Chicago. 25 cents.
  
   
  
  Abraham Lincoln, by Lord Charnwood. Constable & 
  Co., London. $1.50
  
   
  
  The Cultivated Man, by C. W. Eliot. Houghton 
  Mifflin Co. 50 cents.
  
   
  
  * * *
  
   
  
  ARTlCLES OF INTEREST
  
   
  
  Freemasonry in the Bible, by L. Bosman. The 
  Channel
  
   
  
  The Eternities of Masonry, by A. B. Beresford. 
  American Freemason.
  
   
  
  Masonry in Politics, by J. E. Morcomb. American 
  Freemason.
  
   
  
  Early Records of Modern Templar Masonry, J. L. 
  Carson. Tyler-Keystone
  
   
  
  Christian Mysteries, by J. L. Davidge. South 
  Australian Freemason.
  
   
  
  Cuban Freemasonry, by F. de P. Rodriguez. Bulletin 
  Iowa Masonic Library
  
   
  
  Masonic Research in Iowa, Interview with Ye 
  Editor. London Freemason
  
   
  
  Labor Ideals of Masons, by J. G. Gibson. London 
  Freemason.
  
   
  
  The Widow's Son, by F. C. Higgins. Masonic 
  Standard.
  
   
  
  The Lion in Freemasonry, by F. C. Higgins. Masonic 
  Standard.
  
   
  
  Dramatic History of French Masonry, by J. F. Renou. 
  Masonic Standard.
  
   
  
  The Blue and the Gray, by Ye Editor. Masonic Home 
  Journal.
  
   
  
  Masonic Toasts and Table Lodges, by J. L. Carson. 
  Virginia Masonic Journal.
  
   
  
  The Word Blue in the First Three Degrees, by R.E.L. 
  Hall. The New Age.
  
   
  
  ----o----
  
   
  
  THE PERFECT PRAYER
  
   
  
  Dear Lord ! Kind Lord !
  
  Gracious Lord ! I pray
  
  Thou wilt look on all I love
  
  Tenderly today!
  
  Weed their hearts of weariness;
  
  Scatter every care
  
  Down a wake of angel wings
  
  Winnowing the air.
  
   
  
  Bring unto the sorrowing
  
  All release from pain;
  
  Let the life of laughter
  
  Overflow again;
  
  And with all the needy
  
  O divide, I pray,
  
  This vast treasure of content
  
  That is mine today !
  
   
  
  James Whitcomb Riley
  
   
  
  ----o----
  
   
  
  THE QUESTION BOX
  
   
  
  WESLEY AND MASONRY
  
   
  
  A Brother asks if we were correct in saying some 
  time ago, in answer to a question, that Wesley, the founder of Methodism, was 
  not a Mason. Yes; there was a John Wesley initiated into Masonry during the 
  lifetime of the evangelist, but not the evangelist himself - albeit the great 
  preacher sometimes held services in a Freemason's Hall, as we learn from his 
  Journal. Our Brother will find the facts thoroughly sifted and examined in an 
  essay by the late Brother Crawley, in the Transaction of the Coronati Lodge, 
  (vol. 15). If our Brother does not have access to those volumes, we shall be 
  glad to give a more detailed aceount of the matter.
  
   
  
  SHAKESPEARE
  
   
  
  Some months ago you said that there were 
  intimations in Shakespeare to the effect that he knew something of Masonry. 
  Please give some examples. - J.H.L.
  
   
  
  The Duke in Measure for Measure speaks of himself 
  as "a brother of a gracious Order," which may or may not mean the Masonic 
  order. Boindello, in the Taming of the Shrew, addresses old Vincentio as 
  "Worshipful Master." The Archbishop in Henry V. refers to "the singing 
  masons." A servant in Winter's Tale speaks of "working on the square." Mrs. 
  Quickly in Merry Wives refers to "the chairs of the Order." Herbert, in King 
  John, uses these words, which are surely significant:
  
   
  
  "They whisper one another in the ear, 
  
  
  And he that speaks doth grip the hearer's wrist."
  
   
  
  For further examples, together with an argument 
  trying to prove that Shakespeare himself was a Mason, see "Shakespeare a 
  Freemason," by J. C. Parkinson, pp. 52-63.
  
   
  
  * * *
  
   
  
  KITCHENER AS FREEMASON
  
   
  
  In looking through the Glasgow Weekly Herald, of 
  June 24th, I ran across the following statement which may be of interest to 
  Members of the Society: "In all the Kitchener memoirs published recently no 
  mention seems to have been made of his Masonic connections. Yet he has held 
  some of the highest offices in the Craft. Strangely enough, there are few 
  English Masons who can give you the name of his mother Lodge. As a matter of 
  fact, Kitchener was initiated into the Order in Egypt, and there is in 
  existence a photograph of him wearing Masonic regalia." Very truly yours, A. 
  W. Hoy, Iowa.
  
   
  
  * * *
  
   
  
  ACTUAL PAST MASTERS
  
   
  
  I have asked you twice for information of any kind 
  about the Actual Past Master's Degree. Have you neglected it, or is every one 
  else as ignorant on the subject as I am? - T.W.S.
  
   
  
  Actual Past Masters are those who receive the 
  degree of Past Master in symbolic Lodges, as a part of the installation 
  service - after the manner of the Installed Master's rite in England - when 
  elected to preside, and are called Actual Past Masters to distinguish them 
  from those who pass through a ceremony in the Chapter as preparatory to 
  receiving the Royal Arch. It would not be proper to describe the degree, but 
  of its history and development our Brother may read in the article on Past 
  Master, in Mackey's Encyclopedia of Freemasonry.
  
   
  
  * * *
  
   
  
  THE FIRST IDEALIST
  
   
  
  In The Builders, your little book which I much 
  enjoyed, you speak of Akhnaton, king of Egypt, as "the first idealist." Tell 
  me, please, where I can read more about him. - G.D.
  
   
  
  It was Arthur E. P. Weigall, Inspector of 
  Antiquities, Upper Egypt, who described the Egyptian monarch as "the first 
  idealist." He seems to have been a pacifist as well, for he refused to fight 
  to retain a province of his empire on the ground that "a resort to arms was an 
  offense to God." He was born in Thebes in 1375 B. C., and his bones were found 
  in the tomb of his mother, in 1907. Almost any recent history of Egypt will 
  record his story, as for example "The Development of Religion and Thought in 
  Egypt," by Breasted - a most charming and important book.
  
   
  
  ----o----
  
   
  
  RITUAL OF ANCIENT EGYPT
  
   
  
  In the September Builder I note a question asked 
  relative to the Ritual of Ancient Egypt and find that I have in hand a 
  circular announcing such a publication, as follows: New Publication of the 
  Societas Rosicruciana in Anglia, Ritual of the Mystery of the Judgment of the 
  Soul, From the Ancient Egyptian Papyrus, translated and edited by M. W. 
  Blackden, and described as of peculiar interest to students of Freemasonry. 
  Published by John M. Watkins, 21, Cecil Court, Charing Cross Road, London. 
  Price $1.30 post free. Perhaps this is the book the Brother is in quest of. 
  Fraternally, H. L. Seibert, Lakewood, Ohio.
  
   
  
  * * *
  
   
  
  THE CITY TEMPLE
  
   
  
  Our Study Club has used your book, "The Builders," 
  as a text-book during the last year, and it proved an inspiration to all. 
  Could you suggest another book suitable to follow it in the second year's 
  study? Also, would it be proper to tell us something about the City Temple and 
  its work in a future issue of The Builder? It would greatly interest many of 
  your Brethren, knowing that you have been called to that historic pulpit. - 
  J.E.E.
  
   
  
  One of the best Masonic books ever written is 
  "Speculative Masonry," by A. S. Macbride, of the Lodge of Progress, Glasgow, 
  Scotland, and we believe you will find it suitable and profitable for your 
  Club. The Society can secure it for you should you desire it. The story of the 
  City Temple is perhaps best told in the "Life of Joseph Parker," by Albert 
  Dawson. Address the author, 133 Salisbury Square, Fleet Street London E. C., 
  price $1.50. Parker was the founder of the City Temple which stands in the 
  heart of the old city of London, a few squares from the Bank, "the cathedral 
  of the Free Churches," and is perhaps the most responsible pulpit in the 
  world.
  
   
  
  * * * 
  
   
  
  ETHICS OF THE BALLOT
  
   
  
  Dear Bro. Newton: - "The Ethics of the Ballot" in 
  the May number, p 160, prompts me to the following, which I read about forty 
  years ago: "A young man from one of the best families in town - financially 
  socially and religiously, a trusted employe in a bank - sent in his 
  application, and the Brethren congratulated themselves and each other on the 
  influence the acquisition of such a desirable citizen would have on the Order. 
  It went the regular course and a black ball appeared. The W. M. then cautioned 
  the members to be particularly careful as two or three as well as himself had 
  expressed their opinion that it was a mistake. Still the ballot was foul and 
  others expressed themselves, and contrary to all law the W. M. allowed the 
  ballot spread the third time, and still one black ball appeared. Then others 
  were allowed to discuss it until finally all but one brother had spoken, and 
  of course all were looking at him. He was a physician, and when he arose he 
  said, 'Brethren, I cast the blackball; I know this young man to be an 
  irreligious libertine; I know he seduced the daughter of one of our members, 
  our Worshipful Master.'
  
   
  
  Use this or not, in any way you like.
  
   
  
  Fraternally yours,
  
   
  
  S. A. Pancoast.
  
   
  
  * * *
  
   
  
  CORRESPONDENCE
  
   
  
  THE EARLY DAYS: HISTORY VS. TRADITION
  
   
  
  It is much to be regretted that one may not 
  attempt to arrive at the truth of History without being subjected to such 
  unwarranted abuse as characterizes the Article in the July number of The 
  Builder by P.G.M. Melvin M. Johnson of Massachusetts. Bro. Johnson evidently 
  does not comprehend that ridicule or attempted ridicule is not argument, or 
  that misstatement and deliberate misquotation is not legitimate criticism.
  
   
  
  In a series of Articles in The Builder during 1915 
  Bro. Johnson cited several items which the leading Masonic Historians of the 
  country have declared possess little if any historical value, and of the truth 
  of some of his "facts," it is asserted that " it will require authentic 
  documents to satisfy an impartial reader." I ventured to "take friendly issue 
  with Bro. Johnson in some of his statements and conclusions," basing my 
  conclusions upon existing original records only, regarding the authenticity of 
  which no doubt has ever been expressed, and quoting such eminently able 
  authorities as Bros. Gould, Meyer and Nickerson. Nowhere did I make a single 
  statement which may truthfully justify the use of such a phrase as "gross 
  charges by innuendo," "insinuations of faked" statements, or "slanderous and 
  scandalous statements by way of insinuation and innuendo." The quotations 
  cited were carefully noted by me, page and volume stated, and no opinion of my 
  own given in any other way. I was exceedingly careful to say that "we 
  eliminate the ifs, buts, possiblys and every other form of expression which 
  implies doubt, - will present no evidence but that which can today be produced 
  in the Original Record, no copy, no substitute, nor any writing based upon any 
  man's recollection, nor will we admit on either side the employment of any 
  statement whose authenticity is susceptible of any reasonable doubt." 
  Certainly this is eminently fair to both sides of this discussion. The very 
  highest authorities have declared the Massachusetts "history" to be 
  susceptible of very grave doubt. The authenticity of the Henry Price 
  deputation is positively denied, and in the "fac-simile" published in the 
  Proceedings of the Grand Lodge of Massachusetts, 1871, it is declared that the 
  figures of the date have been altered.
  
   
  
  Brethren of the Craft, you who may read this 
  article, in quoting these authors, how say you, have I made "gross charges" 
  against any one by insinuation or otherwise?
  
   
  
  I have made no claim that Masonry in America was 
  not born in Massachusetts, but I decline to accept Bro. Johnson's copies of 
  documents said to have existed a century and three-quarters ago, and I do not 
  ask him or you to accept any copy from me. I was simply giving my reasons for 
  the statement elsewhere made regarding one particular Ledge, Solomon's Lodge 
  No. 1, of Charleston, S. C., which I declared to be upon absolutely 
  unimpeachable evidence the oldest Masonic body in the Western Hemisphere the 
  existing Record of whose establishment is incontestable. Bro. Johnson has 
  produced nothing whatever to disprove this statement. If he can do so, by any 
  authentic original document, ante-dating our South Carolina Record, by one 
  day, I shall unhesitatingly yield our claim with infinitely larger courtesy 
  than he has seen fit to accord me.
  
   
  
  One word more please. I proved beyond question 
  that the first public procession of the Craft in America was in Charleston on 
  May 26, 1737. Bro. Johnson admits the truth "that there was a procession of 
  Masons (though not of a Lodge or Grand Lodge, as such)" on that occasion, but 
  adds "there is nothing to even justifiably infer that regalia was worn." The 
  paragraph copied by me states positively that the occasion was an 
  Entertainment arranged for the "ancient and honourable Society of Free and 
  Accepted Masons" "who came to the Play House, in the usual manner and made a 
  very decent and solemn appearance" and "after the Play the Masons returned to 
  the Lodge in the same order observed in coming to the Play House." How it is 
  possible not to infer that they went as Masons, clothed as Masons, and 
  returned as Masons to their Lodge, must certainly be beyond the comprehension 
  of any candid reader.
  
   
  
  Yours fraternally,
  
   
  
  Wm. G. Mazyck, South Carolina.
  
   
  
  * * *
  
   
  
  THE CHURCH AND FREEMASONRY
  
   
  
  Dear Brother Editor: I have been very much 
  interested in the article on "The Church and the Craft," by Brother Mitchell, 
  appearing in our June number. While I am of the opinion that both institutions 
  have a noble and well-defined objective in the world today yet each must 
  proceed along certain distinct lines to accomplish their destiny. There are, 
  of course, various points of contact wherein they may coincide. Thus far we 
  are agreed, but I must take issue with my good brother in his perhaps 
  unintentional arraignment of the Church in its relations to social progress.
  
   
  
  Let us, again, consider these two forces upon the 
  basis of their contributions to human welfare and uplift. What is the 
  Christian Church ? "First, it is a Commonwealth. In other words, it is a 
  society of men who meet together for common objects, and it differs from the 
  minor clubs or unions under which men avail themselves of the principles of 
  association and resembles those greater societies which we call states, in 
  this respect - that it claims unlimited self-sacrifice on the part of its 
  members and demands that the interest and safety of the whole shall be set by 
  each member above his own interest and above all private interests whatever. 
  Secondly, as all commonwealths are originally based upon some common quality 
  and for the most part on a blood relationship, real or supposed, of the 
  members so is the Christian Church based upon a blood relationship, but the 
  most comprehensive of all - the kindred of every human being to every other. 
  It is therefore absolutely open to all human beings who choose to become 
  members of it."
  
   
  
  No institution has exerted such a wonderful 
  influence for the welfare of humanity as the Church. Founded by the 
  indomitable will of one man, it stands today, the greatest achievement mankind 
  has ever witnessed; it has experienced every change of form, reflecting the 
  dominant lines of thinking through all ages. Much is being written at the 
  present time concerning "The Social Mission of the Church." Not a few persons 
  are denying themselves the privilege of association with the Church, believing 
  that it can bring no message to them. Some think, as does Brother Mitchell, 
  that it goes forward "weighted down with dogmas."
  
   
  
  It is fitting that we pause and consider these 
  questions. What is the Social Mission of the Church? Can the Church lend 
  impetus to economic reforms, identifying itself with class legislation and 
  still preserve itself as a sanctuary for every human heart? The supreme task 
  of the Church is still the preaching of the Gospel, intensifying the 
  individual conscience and bringing to us the precepts of redemption and 
  eternal life. The second task is the "reconstruction of congregational life." 
  The third great task is to "enter into some relation with the arrangements of 
  the world as it finds them. Christianity ought to stand aloof from no common 
  experience of life and the world and it should be open to the consideration of 
  all great questions." These three tasks, briefly stated, are the chief lines 
  of effort involved in the fulfillment of the Social Mission of the Church 
  today. But, "it is enough if religion prepares men's minds for great economic 
  changes and revolutions." We are constrained to admit that in the past, the 
  true character of the Church has been somewhat obscured by scholasticism. But 
  this has been but one more stage in its evolution towards its ultimate destiny 
  as the greatest moral force the world shall ever know. We can no longer 
  rightly say that the Church "takes a man because he has a creed" - it is 
  because he has a need.
  
   
  
  What is Freemasonry? "Masonry is the activity of 
  closely united men, who employing symbolical forms borrowed principally from 
  the mason's trade and from architecture work for the welfare of humanity, 
  striving morally to ennoble themselves and others and thereby to bring about a 
  universal league of mankind which they aspire to exhibit, even now, on a small 
  scale." As Masons, we are taught that our institution is only for those who 
  are "moral and upright before God and of good repute before the world." The 
  Church takes every man as it finds him, seeking to awaken that innate desire 
  for companionship with the higher things in life. Having aroused this yearning 
  in men, they see their existence justified and feel that through surrender and 
  service can they approach nearer these ideals.
  
   
  
  For the betterment of the great rank and file of 
  humanity Freemasonry can only extend its influence indirectly through its 
  adherents. We are a chosen body of men, selected because we possess certain 
  qualifications, requisite to a proper appreciation of the teachings of Masonry 
  and upon which, we are admonished to build our lives, applying the plumb, 
  square, level and trowel. We too, as all other institutions, distinctly state 
  certain principles to which petitioners must conform before they can 
  "participate with us in our labors and privileges." And religion does 
  recommend a man to Masonry, if by religion is understood the feelings and acts 
  of men which relate to God. The great teachings of our order are necessarily 
  confined to a small proportion of mankind. Therefore, despite its strong plea 
  for tolerance, it can never be as universal as the Church of Christ.
  
   
  
  In conclusion, perhaps we have unconsciously 
  merited some opposition from the Church inasmuch as too often a brother 
  declares "Masonry is religion enough for him." But Freemasonry, even though it 
  were a religion, can never satisfactorily answer the four great fundamental 
  questions of every age - God Life, Death, Immortality. Nor can any institution 
  or belief which does not have for its inspiration the life and work of Jesus 
  Christ. Masonry is eternally a quest for light. If, profiting by Masonic 
  intercourse, we have learned to find good in every faith, and if we are truly 
  pursuing that eternal quest for light, we are inevitably led to Him w ho is 
  indeed the very Fountain of Light - the Man of Galilee, whose teachings have 
  illuminated mankind these two thousand years.
  
   
  
  Leland Kress, New Brunswick.
  
   
  
  * * *
  
   
  
  AN ANCIENT PETITION
  
   
  
  Dear Sir and Brother: - In your notice in the July 
  number of The Builder of my work on the "Ancient Documents relating to the A. 
  and A. Scottish Rite in the Archives of the Grand Lodge F. and A. M. of 
  Pennsylvania," the patent of Abram Forst dated April 4, 1781, is mentioned. On 
  page 18 of the book it states that "in his later years Brother Forst appears 
  to have fallen into poverty and returned to Philadelphia, where he applied to 
  the Masonic Fraternity for Charity." The only records upon our minutes show 
  that his petition was read before Grand Lodge September 5, 1791, and referred 
  to the committee on charity. No record of their action has thus far been found 
  in this case. Our records show that Bro. Forst was in the West Indies in 
  April, 1791. From his application to the Grand Lodge it appears that he 
  returned to Philadelphia during the summer of that year.
  
   
  
  Since our Book was published a bundle of petitions 
  for charity from 1779-1809, undisturbed for more than a century in our 
  archives, has been found. These are now arranged, collated and indexed, among 
  which was the original petition of Bro. Abram Forst; a copy of this document 
  is attached as a further example of some of the struggles of our early 
  pioneers in the establishment of the Scottish Rite in America.
  
   
  
  Julius F. Sachse, Pennsylvania.
  
   
  
  TO THE RIGHT WORSHIPFUL GRAND MASTER, GRAND 
  OFFICERS AND MEMBERS OF THE RIGHT WORSHIPFUL GRAND LODGE OF PENNSYLVANIA.
  
   
  
  The Memorial of Abraham Forst,
  
  Past Master &c. &c.
  
   
  
  Humbly Sheweth
  
   
  
  That your Memorialist is at this time much 
  embarrassed owing to unexpected heavy losses and disappointments and is 
  necessitated to supplicate the Right Worshipful Grand Lodge collectively or 
  the Worthy Brethren individually for the loan of a Small Sum of Money to 
  defrey a few debts he has incurred for Board, Lodging, &c. &c. for himself and 
  Son. And as he has a prospect of obtaining a Station in the course of next 
  Month, which will establish him in Such a line of life, as to secure a decent 
  Support for himself and Child; he is fully resolved to repay with Gratitude 
  and Sincere Acknowledgement whatever Sum the Brethren may be pleased to 
  advance him.
  
   
  
  Your Memorialist not being accustomed to make 
  application of this nature, is at a loss how to appologize for trespassing on 
  your time, therefore leaves it to the Subject, and conscious of having never 
  deviated from the strict and Sound Principles of Masonry, Your memorialist 
  trusts that he will meet with that Candor and Generosity which ought be the 
  characteristic of the Franernity, and the requested assistance which he is in 
  so much need of at this particular juncture and can be authenticated by 
  Several of your respectable Members. Your Memorialist challenges any man to 
  prove that he is not a strict Moral man & it may alledged with truth that he 
  has been very unfortunate during a Series of 10 years, but never guilty of a 
  dishonest or mean action.
  
   
  
  And your Memorialist as in Duty Bound will ever 
  pray &c. Abr. h Forst,
  
   
  
  Philada, 5h, Septemr, 1791.
  
  A. C. and of Masonry, 5791.
  
   
  
  If any of the respectable Brethren,
  
  should at any time have occasion
  
  to employ an accomptant or Book
  
  Keeper, The Memorialist begs to
  
  offer his services, till he is provid
  
  ed for.
  
   
  
  * * *
  
   
  
  "UNTO THE LEAST OF THESE"
  
   
  
  The Atlanta Bodies of the Scottish Rite of Free 
  Masonry maintain a Hospital for crippled children. There is no limitation of 
  applicants on account of State Lines, Creed, Masonic connection or anything, 
  save that the applicant must be absolutely poor and unable to pay anything, 
  and there must be some hope of improvement being possible - nothing else.
  
   
  
  We have recevied applicants from various States 
  and only three in whom we could trace any Masonic connection. The finest 
  orthopoedic surgery in the Country is given by the surgeon without charge or 
  fee of any kind. The Hospital is now located in two connected wood shingle 
  roofed cottages. The result of a fire would be appalling. There is no 
  operating room. Children must be carried to some Sanitarium, operating room 
  rented, and carried back to the Hospital after operation. Any movement after 
  severe bone operation is excessively painful. Some of these children must 
  undergo several separate operations. The Hospital can accommodate only twenty 
  patients. There are 4000 of these unfortunates in the State of Georgia alone. 
  We must build and equip a Hospital that will be fire proof and accommodate 
  from 76 to 100 children. To do this will cost about $75,000.00. To maintain 
  such an institution will cost about $30,000 a year. This, the Atlanta Bodies 
  propose to do but it will tax their resources to the limit of their capacity. 
  It is therefore necessary that we receive aid in building the Hospital. The 
  cures already effected have been remarkable.
  
   
  
  1
  
   
  
  I am only a poor little cripple, 
  
  
  Crooked, gnarled, twisted and knotted 
  
  
  I tugged at a starved, flaccid nipple, 
  
  
  The spawn of a father, besotted.
  
   
  
  2 
  
  Born contorted and warped in this fashion 
  
  
  I live, because live I must; 
  
  The fruit of a drunken passion, 
  
  The result of a whirlwind of lust.
  
   
  
  3 
  
  Yet somehow, within this poor framework, 
  
  
  From some source, God only knows where; 
  
  
  As if to rebuke this vile shamework, 
  
  
  Has entered a spirit most fair.
  
   
  
  4 
  
  While I lie here so helpless and quiet, 
  
  
  Unable to turn or to move, 
  
  My thoughts in wild fancies run riot 
  
  
  In fields that my eyes can not prove.
  
   
  
  5 
  
  Can you, who are born better sired 
  
  
  Who could do, if only you would, 
  
  
  Dream the Hell in which I am mired 
  
  
  Who would do, if only I could? 
  
   
  
  6
  
  Can you feel the wild, passionate longing? 
  
  
  Can you hear that which doth to me talk? 
  
  
  Every moment my tired brain thronging, 
  
  
  Dear God ! If I only could walk.
  
   
  
  7 
  
  God grant that unto you never, 
  
  May come such a thought, in a dream, 
  
  
  It would haunt you forever and ever; 
  
  
  And murder your sleep, with a scream.
  
   
  
  8 
  
  There's one hope. But for me a grim specter 
  
  
  Bars even that one tiny door, 
  
  I have no one to aid - No protector, 
  
  
  Dear Christ! I am frightfully poor.
  
   
  
  9 
  
  Had I Gold, then perhaps I could hire 
  
  
  The help of a great surgeon's knife 
  
  
  To fashion my clay from this mire 
  
  
  And fit me for something in life.
  
   
  
  10
  
  Yet though a great surgeon be ready 
  
  
  To save me, without charge or fee; 
  
  
  Though my soul and my nerve be both steady, 
  
  
  There is nowhere a home built for me.
  
   
  
  11
  
  My spirit cries out with wild yearning - 
  
  
  The saving knife beckons me - Come - 
  
  
  Oh Man, spare enough of your earning, 
  
  
  For Christ's sake; to build me a home.
  
   
  
   
  
  Checks should be sent to
  
  Jos. C. Greenfield, Gen'l Sec'y
  
  Masonic Temple
  
  Atlanta, Ga.
  
   
  
  * * *
  
   
  
  MASONRY IN WAR-TIME
  
   
  
  Dear Sir: In contrast to the attitude of the Grand 
  Lodge of England during the present war in excluding from meetings of the 
  Fraternity in Lodges under its jurisdiction all Brethren who owe allegiance to 
  enemy flags, or are descended from such it may be interesting to note the 
  action proposed by R. W. Henry Price, the Founder of Duly Constituted Masonry 
  in America, at a meeting of The First Lodge in Boston which was held on 
  October 10, 1744, viz:
  
   
  
  "The Lodge being Open'd, Brother Henry Price 
  propos'd Capt: Delabraz as a Candidate and acquainted the Lodge that he was a 
  Gentleman who being a Prisoner of War was thereby reduced, but as he might be 
  servicable (when at Home) to any Bro whom Providence might cast in his way, it 
  was desir'd he might be excus'd the Expence of his making, provided each Bro: 
  would contribute his Cloathing, which the Rt: Worshl: Masr: was pleas'd to put 
  to Vote, when it was carried in affirmative, & by dispensation from the Rt: W: 
  Masr: & Wards: upon accot: of his leaving the Province very soon, he was 
  Ballotted in, Introduced & made a Mason in due Form. * * Voted That the Secr: 
  grant Bro: Delabraz a Letter of Recommendation."
  
   
  
  I have a notion that even those Brethren of 
  neutral countries whose sympathies are entirely with England and her allies in 
  this war will regard this action of 1744 as more Masonic than the action of 
  1915. Indeed, I am reliably informed by an officer of the Grand Lodge of 
  England who was present when the vote in question was taken last year, that if 
  the question had been decided by the older and more experienced Brethren - say 
  for instance those who had attained to the rank of Right Worshipful - the 
  action of our English Brethren in Grand Lodge would have been quite different.
  
   
  
  Fraternally yours,
  
   
  
  Melvin M. Johnson, Mass.
  
   
  
  * * * 
  
   
  
  NON-MASONIC BODIES
  
   
  
  Dear Editor: An explanation would be interesting 
  of the attitude Masons should assume in regard to those non-masonic bodies who 
  are building upon Masonic foundations. Such as the White Shrine of Jerusalem, 
  The Senate, The Grotto, etc. The following interpretation was given by the 
  Grand Lodge of Nebraska, in its last communication:
  
   
  
  "This Grand Lodge claims and will exercise the 
  right to determine the Masonic standing of any Mason who joins any society, 
  lodge or organization, a requisite to whose membership is membership in a 
  Masonic lodge, and therefore recommends the adoption of the following preamble 
  and resolution:
  
   
  
  "Whereas, divers and sundry societies and 
  organizations are seeking to establish themselves in Nebraska and build on 
  Masonry as their foundation stone; and
  
   
  
  "Whereas, it is the duty of the Grand Lodge of 
  Ancient Free and Accepted Masons of Nebraska, to care for the welfare of the 
  members of its several lodges, and protect them from organizations that have 
  no relation to Masonry, and yet seek to attach themselves thereto:
  
   
  
  "Therefore Be It Resolved, That the Grand Lodge of 
  Ancient Free and Accepted Masons of Nebraska, in the exercise of its sovereign 
  rights and powers, declares that it is unlawful for any Mason of this Grand 
  Jurisdiction to make application to or join any lodge, society or institution 
  that shall provide as a condition precedent that one shall be a Master Mason 
  in good standing, or shall have taken the degrees of Entered Apprentice, 
  Fellow Craft and Master Mason; providing that this inhibition shall not apply 
  to York and Scottish Rite bodies, the Order of the Eastern Star, or to the 
  Ancient Arabic Order Nobles of the Mystic Shrine."
  
   
  
  Amendments to the Law - Sect. 96-A - "A lodge room 
  can be lawfully dedicated if occupied only by the following othe bodies: a 
  chapter of Royal Arch Masons, a council of Royal an Select Masters, a 
  commandery of Knights Templar, a body of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish 
  Rite, a chapter of the Order of the Eastern Star, a temple of the Ancient and 
  Arabic Order Nobles of the Mystic Shrine, and a chapter of the Acacia 
  Fraternity and the Achoth Sorority.
  
   
  
  Masonic Offenses - Sect. :148 - "In making 
  application to, a joining, any lodge, society or institution that shall 
  provide as a condition precedent that one shall be a Master Mason in good 
  standing, or shall have taken the degrees of Entered Apprentice Mason, Fellow 
  Craft Mason, and Master Mason, provided this inhibition shall not apply to 
  York or Scottish bodies the Order of the Eastern Star, the Ancient Arabic 
  Order Nobles of the Mysti Shrine, or the Acacia Fraternity."
  
   
  
  Fraternally yours,
  
   
  
  Henry H. Andrews, Nebraska.
  
   
  
  * * *
  
   
  
  PENNSYLVANIA VS. MASSACHUSETTS
  
   
  
  Dear Sir and Brother: Referring to the "Early 
  Days" in the July issue - Mazyck vs. Johnson - Massachusetts as usual seeks to 
  claim everything and attempts to fortify the claim by notice from the Boston 
  Gazette of April 1, 1734, which so far as it goes is all right; but how about 
  Pennsylvania? I am sending you by package post an electro of the heading of 
  Franklin Gazette of December 3-8, 1730, No. 108, which if you can find room 
  for, will speak for itself.
  
   
  
  The true facts are, and cannot be controverted by 
  argume or sophistry:
  
   
  
  Pennsylvania 1730 - Massachusetts 1734
  
  Magna est Veritas et Praevalet.
  
   
  
  It would be well if the R. W. Bro. of 
  Massachusetts would consult the Franklin Memorial Volume issued by the Grand 
  Lodge of Pennsylvania in 1907.
  
   
  
  So far as South Carolina is concerned, there are 
  evidence that Freemasonry was originally introduced in South Carolina by Bro. 
  Thomas Whitemarsh, a member of St. John's Lodge, in Philadelphia, and partner 
  of Franklin in the printing business in Charlestown, S.C., as early as 1701-2.
  
   
  
  Julius F. Sachse, Pennsylvania.
  
   
  
  ----o----
  
   
  
  Brothers
  
   
  
  Although you are just a poor man, 
  
  
  And your clothes are cheap and worn 
  
  
  If your heart has known repentance, 
  
  
  I'll welcome you to our home.
  
   
  
  Even though your birth be humble,
  
  If you want to be a man,
  
  We'll believe in you, my brother,
  
  And extend a helping hand
  
   
  
  It matters not about your past, 
  
  Or the color of your skin, 
  
  Or what your education is, 
  
  Listen to the Voice within.
  
   
  
  If you will spend your time and earnings
  
  On a brother in distress,
  
  Helping those who are afflicted,
  
  And the weak ones' wrongs redress,
  
   
  
  Then you are a man deserving 
  
  Of my love and my esteem 
  
  And I care not what your actions 
  
  
  In the eyes of others seem.
  
   
  
  Should society disown you,
  
  As inferior to its caste
  
  Let it do so - I'll befriend you,
  
  And be your brother to the last.
  
   
  
  Z P. Smith.